PKLambooy
Oppenheimer was a GREAT series (it was the first thing I saw Waterston in) and it is too bad copies aren't available. A similar situation exists for "Glory Enough for All", a British series from around the same time, about the discovery of insulin. I would pay a good price for both of these on DVD. Is it really so difficult to get Oppenheimer on a DVD that is able to be played in the US? Another very enjoyable series, again from about the same time, was "Danger UXB". A series about defusing UneXploded Bombs, hence the name. That one you can get from your local library.Pete
clawson-11
I, too, found "Oppenheimer" to be a brilliant series and one of the finest offerings ever on American PBS. David Suchet was particularly effective as Edward Teller, as I recall, and the overall conception was spectacularly good. The only reason that the series doesn't rate a full 10/10 is for the low-budget production values in some areas. Actual content is absolutely first-rate in my recollection.The Oppenheimer miniseries will be released in the UK on July 31st! It will be a Region 2/PAL set, but it would seem that a Region 1/NTSC set should be soon in the offing.If you have a universal player in the US, you can order the series right now from Amazon UK.http://tinyurl.com/znyyqHuzzah!!
richardw-11
>>> Great News there is a BBC DVD release scheduled for 31st July 2006,UK - there is also a scheduled release in States - don't know the date - can't wait ! ! <<<<>>>> below is my original comment <<<<<I agree with all the other reviewers - it is simply staggering that one of the greatest TV dramas ever has never been released on DVDThe story line is gripping - the acting is outstanding and the character development is enthralling !Over here in the UK we have quite a history of getting TV drama series and films out onto DVD through popular campaigns It's very hard to see why the rights owners do not go into a DVD production ? I'm going to e:mail one of the leading players in this grass roots movement and see what happens. Who did the production ? was it BBC ? RW
Robert J. Maxwell
Like an earlier commenter, I saw it in 1980 and have never been able to shake the memory of the gripping story and splendid acting. The dramatic score by Carl Davis is majestically bombastic, as befits a story about a bomb, and hard to forget. The film certainly contains some of Sam Waterston's finest work. He and the writers depict Oppenheimer not simply as an unjustly victimized hero -- which he was -- but also as naive, fond of alcohol, given to mixing with the wrong women and the wrong political crowd, and snobbish, a rounded portrait instead of a stereotype.Dozens of scientists are gathered together in the New Mexico desert to work on the first atomic bomb. Oppenheimer runs the brains, but the general in charge of the overall operation -- building the bomb, building the buildings, maintaining security -- is Leslie Groves, the Grand Panjandrum who pronounces Russians as "Roosians". He's an engineer and constantly worried that these commie eggheads are doing too much talking and not enough work. "We've got the finest scientists in the WORLD," he crows, "and they're all OURS." They include immigrants, many of them Jews, from Italy, Hungary, Britain, Germany, and so forth, as Oppenheimer points out. "Yes -- but they all come HERE!", shouts groves, indignant and puzzled.All of the characters are as complex as they would be in real life. We see plenty of Oppenheimer's anguish as he obeys the military. But in many ways, the figure of General Leslie Groves (Manning Redwood) is the most interesting because his complexity is reduced to a point that renders it easy to grasp. We, as adults, can empathize with ambiguity better than we can understand the simple single-mindedness of a child.He's a chauvinist and a moral nihilist. Instead of a dozen scientists cooperating on different parts of the bomb, he wants to seal them off from each other to enhance security, which is anathema to these idealists. One can easily imagine a heroic John Wayne in the role. "It's INTERESTING? I don't want something interesting; I want a BOMB." (Groves is usually shouting.) He seems almost to set out to make a buffoon of himself in the eyes of all these academics. One of his exit lines from an argument is that he doesn't have a Ph.D. like the rest of them but he's spent eleven years in military administration and construction. "Let's see. That's the equivalent of two Ph.D.s, isn't it?" He leaves the eggheads agog as he sweeps through the door because the only thing that matters to them is their brilliance and the usefulness of their contributions to the project.And when the gadget is finally used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and everyone is watching films of the destruction -- both cities laid waste; prisons, schools, hospitals and individuals vanished -- the scientists are thoughtful and silent. Not General Groves. He's jumping for joy. "One bomb did all that -- and it's OURS!" One hundred and fifty four prisoners dead in their cells? "Right on the BUTTON!" Later he chides Oppenheimer for his remorse, assuring him that he'll get over it. But, as adults, we know that it was a terrible instrument of war and it was terrible to use it, whether we had any choice or not. How many of Edward Teller's "superbombs" do we and the rest of the world have in our arsenals now. It must be in the thousands, isn't it?Of course this is a topical biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer, not the story of the conception, building, and deployment of the first atomic bombs. If you want the context, an hour-long documentary is available free on YouTube: The Moment in Time: The Manhattan Project. It's interesting in its own right.This was one of the finest miniseries I've ever seen on television, and there wasn't a serial murderer in it, unless they were all serial murderers.
