Maidgethma Wonderfully offbeat film!

Nonureva Really Surprised!

Sexyloutak Absolutely the worst movie.

FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

miguelstewart I like Zachary Quinta as far as it goes, but yet again, the History Channel disappoints. ZQ should hang his head in shame to be a part of this mess. I struggled through two episodes; AI and Time Travel. The AI episode was reduced to a discussion on how soon we might have realistic sex dolls. I don't know where to even start with the time travel episode. What does time travel have in common with 'infrasound"? Evidently nothing but it took us 15 minutes to find out...or like the airplane story, maybe my experience watching it was so awful, time slowed down and it only felt like 15 minutes. The take away? Run from this poorly thought out, poorly written, not even titilating, junk yard mess. You will learn nothing of interest.

rsvp321 A good 7.5, at least.I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the negative votes for this series is from the lunatic fringe - upset that the topic subjects were revealed as "disproven".Because of that skepticism not edited out, thereby leaving belief or dismissal to the viewer, I will continue watching!

Pro_Viewer At first I thought it would be another weak and meaningless TV Show...I was pleasantly surprised when they administered the polygraph test, looked the guy in the face, told him he failed because he was not truthful.My feeling of satisfaction were reinforced when the alleged Alien Implant proved to be nothing more than a Iron fragment.There were enough "What If's" to keep me watching and it was Awesome to have a Host not blowing smoke up... I will be watching Mr. Quinto in this NEW TV series!

generationofswine I guess it's cute that Zachary Quinto is hosting the new in search of given that he also played Spock. But, that doesn't mean it has the same heart.The first "In Search Of..." the real Spock's series, had a lot more heart to it and seemed more inquisitive than this one.At least it, the original, seemed like it had a thesis but was considering evidence about the thesis. It didn't seem to walk in with the clear assumption that they were right and then only look for the evidence that backs it up.This one seems that it's only going to accept the evidence that fits the thesis and throw everything else out. It doesn't even really emphasis that it's based on "theory and conjuncture" like the first one did, that was the draw to it, the appeal.This comes across more like Ancient Aliens, where everything BUT the thesis is discounted and they don't really want to entertain how much of it is just speculative theories to entertain and titillate.Really it's more History Channel Junk. The title makes you miss the Josh Bernstein era where, when they went for speculation and conjuncture and pure titillation, at least it felt like they were being honest about the conclusions.This just feels like Ancient Alien conspiracy crap with no real effort to be anything more than speculation past off as total truth.