Dynamixor The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

Voxitype Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

jaylun This movie is bad-painfully so. Writing, acting, the whole nine yards is bad. Which is EXACTLY why I watched this movie! The sparse nudity is not enough to carry you through this stinky piece of cheese. I have to admit that characters are developed enough so you actually get concerned with a few of their fates, but this is a multi-tasker-you can do something else while watching it and not miss anything. I would recommend watching this with friends. Get some popcorn and a group and let the comments fly. Almost everything in this movie has been done before, so there really are no surprises. That is the problem for new zombie movie directors and writers, they need to come up with a hook to spin the 'accepted' lore to create new interest.

trashgang Stated as a zombedy (zombie and comedy). But I didn't laugh, really maybe on wrinkle on the left corner of my mouth. I won't spoil to many on this turkey. Okay, there is a lot of juggs on view, even pierced ones, and from A-cups to the over-sized US fake ones, but then again, it was gratuitous. It had nothing to do with the storyline. Yeah yeah, it is an attack in a strip club called Grindhouse so you know that nudity will play a big role but what really went wrong is the acting, it is really terrible. And again, I know that they should play dumb, especially the blond ones but it is over the top. Secondly being a low budget you have to deal with the gore and the effects. Sadly most of them is CGI and the kind you can buy at 1£ shops. Even when they are fighting you can see that they don't hit their victims. And overall it's a bit too much blah blah. I am digging zombie flicks as my favorite flicks but this here, man. Go look at "Doghouse" or "Lesbian Vampire Killers", there you have a laugh but maybe I'm more into UK humor than US humor. Go figure it out for yourselves...

Jan Andersen I picked this up for about $5 and it was almost worth it. Pay more and I think you'll be pretty disappointed.I was expecting cheesy and hoping for a laugh or two in the company of some hot babes, kinda like Lesbian Vampire Killers just with Zombies, but it was more like Land of the Dead with Jam for blood. I wouldn't really call it funny, but I chuckled a bit and had a few laughs at the movie.It's about on par with a very good school play, but in the hands of professionals I think it could have been a pretty good show.. It's clearly budget, but the writing is okay. They could even keep the actors if they got some pros behind the cameras, sound, efx and cgi, because that part really sucked.. The jingle almost ruined it at the beginning, but there is practically no music, not even for atmosphere or building up tension, in it. I guess, that's a actually a good thing in light of the really poor technical side of it; it could have been much worse.

Anthony Pittore III (Shattered_Wake) After a mishap with a new drug, the experiment's subjects (aka 'victims') turn into ravenous flesh-eating zombies. Locked up in a strip club, a group of exotic dancers must fight for their lives against the horde of undead or fall victim to the infectious bite of the rotting ghouls.Rookie director Jason Murphy brings another installment in the 'Undead Exotic Dancer' subsubgenre (being released just before Zombie Strippers! (2008)) with his film Zombies! Zombies! Zombies!. While I wasn't such a fan of the mildly entertaining Zombie Strippers!, I thought I would give this one a look to help viewers choose which Naked Flesheaters (title for the next one?) were more worth the watch. When it comes down to it, this film doesn't have to work very hard to please me. Horror-comedies make up a good amount of my favourite films (from Freaked to Shaun of the Dead, I'll take 'em all). Toss in zombies (the best subgenre in horror) and naked, blood-soaked women and you've got it made. Zombie Strippers! failed, for me, because it tried too hard without the ability to attain what it wanted to be. Had it simply take itself less seriously, it would've been more enjoyable. Luckily, Zombies! Zombies! Zombies! knew how to take itself for what it was: A fun, light-hearted zombie romp through a gentleman's club. The opening scene alone, while not technically part of the film itself, is one of the funniest scenes I've ever seen in a horror film. It ranks up there with Nic Cage in a bear costume (though this one was intentionally hilarious). As a $200,000 budget would suggest, there are some pretty obvious problems. Most notably, the audio/video quality is very cheap. The sound ranges from ear-piercing to muffled and can get annoying. Also, the cheap shot-on-video look is something that has been putting off a lot of horror fans from modern low-budget cinema. It's something that needs to be looked past, however, in order to enjoy a film like this. It is helped, however, that the poor video quality is showing someone like Lyanna Tumaneng (who plays Dallas Skye). Beyond the a/v problems, the rest of the problems of low-budget film-making show, but the filmmakers knew how to utilize them in a way that makes them funny enough to laugh WITH instead of laugh AT. That's really what makes the film worth it. . . it knows it's bad, and it takes advantage of that. If cheesy schlock isn't for you, then neither is this film.Final verdict: 5.5/10 – Averaged from an 8/10 for entertainment and a 3/10 as a film.-AP3-