Matcollis This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

Supelice Dreadfully Boring

Micah Lloyd Excellent characters with emotional depth. My wife, daughter and granddaughter all enjoyed it...and me, too! Very good movie! You won't be disappointed.

Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Leofwine_draca YESTERDAY'S TARGET is a rubbishly little television movie detailing a plot involving time travel. The whole thing has a cheap and grainy look which has to be seen to be believed; I found the whole thing quite unwatchable. Poor old Daniel Baldwin stars and makes no impression with his acting whatsoever, while a miscast LeVar Burton hams it up a lot as the villain of the piece. The story is mindless and stupid, and the action scenes laughable.

Comeuppance Reviews Paul Harper (Baldwin) has telekinesis. Jessica Harper (Haiduk) can see into the future. And Carter (Carter) has flame-throwing abilities. These three unlikely allies are on the run from Winstrom (Burton) and his boss Holden (McDowell). It seems Winstrom also has special powers and is after them. Also they can travel through time and are all in our present day. It's never made completely clear why any of this is happening. Who will become Yesterday's Target? If you look up the phrase "video store shelf-filler" in the dictionary, there just might be a picture of Yesterday's Target. Also you have a pretty awesome dictionary. It's an out-and-out sci-fi slog, but the filmmakers might have figured that if they get a good cast and make sure it's 79 minutes long, viewers could tolerate anything. Well, this movie proves them wrong. The short running time, which we normally approve of (usually for action movies) seems too truncated to support a science fiction film with some complex ideas. It's choppiness would indicate that there's plenty left on the cutting room floor.As for the cast, clearly LeVar Burton was trying to shed his "Reading Rainbow" image by playing the baddie (not entirely convincingly) both here and in his episode of "Deadly Games" on TV at the time. He has an evil hat that makes him look like a sinister Herman Cain. Presumably that's all you can do to make LeVar look eVil. Malcolm McDowell does almost nothing, although in one scene there is a poster for A Clockwork Orange (1971). You can practically see director Barry Samson snickering to himself about how clever and "meta" he is. Actually, you can imagine him doing that throughout the course of this turkey. Daniel Baldwin puts forth a modicum of effort, as do Haiduk, Carter and Herd, but you can't really blame them for not bringing their A-game to this dud. Interestingly, Baldwin calls a character "Sparky". In Desert Thunder (1999) he calls someone "Slappy". Is Baldwin ad libbing this stuff? If so, are these the only ad libs he can come up with? Does he call people "Sparky" and "Slappy" in real life? What would you do if Daniel Baldwin called you one of these names? These are the true mysteries of Yesterday's Target.Special mention should go to Trevor Goddard, who we are fans of. Even his screen presence can't save things. Yesterday's Target is the type of movie that would be played on the Sci-Fi channel before they became "SyFy" and got into the whole phase of movies about dinosharks, dinocrocs, sharktopuses, sharktopiranhas, giraffehippobirds, slothtoadchickens or whatever else these geniuses deem as top-shelf Science Fiction. Asimov, Heinlein and Clarke would surely be proud. But as far as Y'sT, at least there's no CGI to screw things up even further. Adding to the annoyance is that all the characters are continually arguing, and there's little-to-no character development, so you really don't care about their plight.Yesterday's Target is pretty darn bad. Despite the cast, you'll want to avoid this one.

anonreviewer The main problem with this movie is that most of the actors are out of their league with this kind of genre.I had not really seen Levar Burton in much else, but he really does NOT have much of a handle on playing the heavy/the villain. Cuz he really stinks up the joint here. The chick (stacy haiduk) is not too good either. And the guy who played a role in Seinfeld had best stick to comedy. Baldwin is not that great, either, although he does a better job than anyone else but Carter, who acts serviceably. The two "agents" are pretty bad, too!So basically this movie does not have much in the way of acting.However it has nice production values and a nice stylish look to it.And the script is not that bad; not great, but not bad.Not a bad movie to watch if you have some time to waste, but nothing sepecial.

liammurphy1 This film had great possibilities had it had a bigger budget, better acting and realised Daniel Baldwin is by far the worst actor among his brothers as he makes a pretty poor hero and sleepwalks through his role. Malcolm Mcdowell as his usual hammy villain,is poorly underused with about 3 lines throughtout the movie. the guy from star trek should definatley stick to Star trekDon't be mislead by the hilarious quote on the box'anyone waiting for terminator 3 should look no further''could have been great but as it is most people will have seen this kind of thing made better in the past6/10