Kattiera Nana I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

WillSushyMedia This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.

Stephanie There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Staci Frederick Blistering performances.

bfan83 God! this film was sooo horrible but thank god for Lilith Stabs! She really brought the production to life with her evil vampy look. The rest of the movie, if you can call it that, was terrible soft-core porn. But it did have some dark content to it and the box cover art was fantastic. I think it was because of director Everette Hartsoe. He's also some kind of comic book creator, I think. Get this movie only if you're a fan of Lilith Stabs. I hope DEMONATRIX is much better.

lthseldy1 This movie was really bad, I think that the title fooled me because I thought that there would be at least more vampire call girls and more of a vampire acting but what I got was a bunch of boring sex scenes including a girl straddling a washing machine while some goof with glasses watches through a peep hole, a lady at a club watching the most horrible band in the world play with a guy playing a guitar with only one note and then she takes him back stage, or vice versa and straddles the guy. Then there's the red neck who gets ripped off by one of the call girls and goes after her at the head call girl's house and asks for his money back and they all seduce him instead. This movie was nothing but a compilation of lame skits, terrible acting and left overs from last years copy of Hustler and thats it.

DarkObserver This movie is -well- trash. But not like trash with cult potential like the movies of Ed Wood. It's not really a sex film, but not really a horror movie either: It's a soft-core skin flick with a vampire theme as a cover. Maybe it's because I'm European but I don't get overly aroused by stark naked women taking a shower or straddling a washing machine. (You can see this kind of stuff every night on TV here) The horror is not strong enough to catch my interest either; because of lack of a budget for special effects. But at least the director, who also stars in the lead role, has a sense of humor. If I took a bunch of friends from the Gothic scene and made a movie it would be much spicier than this, but I guess by American standards the movie went as far as it could without getting its maker into trouble. The women are quite nice too, even if they are a bit slutty.I'm really not sure if I like this movie but that depends on one's expectations -and preferences- of course. If you like to see prolonged scenes in which amateurish female actors show their -uh- endowments while dancing around and light male bondage you will probably want to see this movie.

EarlWerks Gothic? Bondage? Sexy vampires? If you don't like them, don't watch this movie. Aside from a good look at some of the ladies, there's nothing else.A good but low-budget production does the best it can with its underdeveloped script. The vampires don't seem enough of a threat, and it's hard to understand how they stay in business this way.I've heard they plan a sequel anyways.