StunnaKrypto Self-important, over-dramatic, uninspired.

RyothChatty ridiculous rating

Protraph Lack of good storyline.

Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation

june-sasser The guy Sinatra is looking for throughout the film is named Nimmo. I just couldn't let that go by without comment. This is good light entertainment. Florida in the 1960's is not bad to look at. A few good laughs thrown in. All in all not a bad flick. Ms. Rowlands looked incredible. Almost Grace Kelly good looking. St. John was good. Conte was good. Simon Oakland did his usual great job. Oakland must have been working somewhere every day of the 60's and 70's. And Frank was Frank.

HotToastyRag I watched this movie with my brother when we were in high school, and we couldn't stop laughing. It's pretty much a non-stop joke fest about sex, body parts, prostitution, and more sex. Back in the sixties, it was pretty wild to be able to make those jokes, since the previous three decades were ruled by the Hays Code censorship. Nowadays, these jokes might only be funny to teenagers, or teenagers at heart.Frank Sinatra plays, well, Frank Sinatra. He has a revolving door of good looking broads, shoots bad guys, parties, and hangs out at strip clubs. His character in the film is slightly different, as he's a private detective and lives on a houseboat in Miami Beach, but I guess if Tony Rome had taken place in Las Vegas, it would have felt too much like a documentary. The three main broads are Jill St. John, Gena Rowlands, and Sue Lyon, but there's a buffet of babes in bikinis and lingerie if you're watching the movie for the eye candy.The detective-theft part of the plot isn't particularly extraordinary, but is anyone really watching it for that? No, we want to watch Frank Sinatra juggle scantily-clad babes and crack sex jokes. And we'll be very happy.

bcstoneb444 One could make a case that 'Tony Rome' is the best private eye movie of the 1960s. Also we could argue that it's the first neo-noir, depending how one defines these things. In any case a lot of the film's success can be attributed to Sinatra, who is just terrific. The Tony Rome persona is clearly in the tradition of the classic private detective. However, Sinatra gives the character a more laid back, hip quality than the usual Old School tough detectives we saw in the 1940s, played by the likes of Bogart, Mitchum and Dick Powell. Given the setting and lifestyle, the character of Rome is also an obvious first cousin to Travis McGee of the John D. MacDonald novels. Moreover, in its way the film anticipates Miami Vice of two decades later. The style and mood is more early than late 60s, and there is a whiff of 007 with the lush Miami Beach backdrop, zingy repartee, frequent consumption of alcohol, top-notch production values, and beautiful women. And like the Bond films of that era, some of the sensibilities are, by today's standards, decidedly un-pc. To wit: Rome's penchant for violence, to the point of sadism; and the depiction of most of the women characters as little more than sex objects. Still, the film provides a good time capsule-like view of what Miami Beach was like a half century ago. Perhaps the best thing about TR is the cast of quirky secondary characters, played to perfection by the fine supporting cast. Refreshing to see Richard Conte as a cop instead of a mobster. And Jill St. John makes for a fetching (semi)romantic interest for Rome. There's not much that's new in 'Tony Rome,' but there's not a lot that's wrong with it either.

MartinHafer This is an interesting and very modern detective film. Frank Sinatra plays the title role--a private detective who seems very cool and disaffected. Of the three detective shows he made in the late 60s, I'd rate this one #2--behind the superior film "The Detective". However, this exceptional film is not related to "Tony Rome" or its sequel "The Lady in Cement". Regardless, Sinatra's world-weary performances were excellent--even if he seemed to try to make it look like he's not trying.The film begins with Tony doing what seems like a very mundane and not at all dangerous task--bringing home a drunk young lady to her rich daddy (Simon Oakland). Oddly, however, this good deed ended up leading to an apparently minor task--to find the young lady's missing earring. And, this task led to murder...in fact, a LOT of murders and mayhem. By late 60s standards, this film is awfully violent and Tony isn't exactly always the macho hero. Although he generally gets the best of it, he, too, gets the crap knocked out of him a few times in this rough and tumble film.As I said, I preferred Sinatra's "The Detective", but not by much. "Tony Rome" is a very good private eye film--a bit like a grittier version of "The Rockford Files"...minus most of the laughs. It's also odd that Tony is NOT the perfect manly sort of hero--especially since he repeatedly shows a stronger desire to wrap up the case than unwrap the very alluring Jill St. John--who spends much of the movie pursuing Tony. A very good film--especially since the mystery turns out to be a very interesting one. Worth your time.By the way, a couple interesting parts in the film are a cameo by the ex-champ Rocky Graziano as well as a VERY unusual sort of role for the comic Shecky Greene. Also, I just loved Tony's line "This is not a family. Just a bunch of people living at the same address." Priceless and indicative of the sort of smart-allecky stuff he tosses about during the film.