AutCuddly Great movie! If you want to be entertained and have a few good laughs, see this movie. The music is also very good,

Edwin The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

Haven Kaycee It is encouraging that the film ends so strongly.Otherwise, it wouldn't have been a particularly memorable film

Cheryl A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

Dark_Lord_Mark I thought this movie was bad but fun. The two male leads were over the top acting. Kelly Brook was a hot air head.....with not emotional range beyond smiling and complaining. She was the plot device in reality.Billy Zane is a good bad guy actor....he was so over the top along with the Spanish lead guy. What a hooky accent....everything seemed so out of place.In the bad movie scale, I give this a 10....very entertaining.Overall a 5 out of 10 movie.This is not a good movie though...nothing appealing..I know some beautiful people. But absolutely nothing is good about it.

malcolm-68 This was her bid for serious consideration as a dramatic actress by Kelly Brook. Whilst not a good film, it is not as bad as might be expected. It is directed and acted in a professional manner but the script has some atrocious loopholes and at least one character disappears out of the film and is never seen or referred to again. Brook is cast as a female Robinson Crusoe shipwrecked on a barren island along with two other survivors one her husband and the other a seaman and potential lover. Naturally the two men fight over Kelly. There is also voodoo symbolism which is pointless and laid on with a trowel. Normally less is more where sex is a theme in a film, but "Three" would have benefited from more of Kelly's skin. One sex scene would have been more convincing if she had been totally topless. In another scene where she is striding in sand, she should have been nude. This film was a box office dud and probably fared better on DVD. Nevertheless one hopes that this will not be the end of Kelly's film career. It is doubtful if producers will ever beat a path to her door, but she could be well cast as a femme fa-tale in a Bond movie or a female Tarzan or given the current Olympic games as an athlete - in fact any role which emphasises her physical assets and her latent acting ability.

lastliberal Kelly Brook walks out of the water onto the beach just like Ursula Andress in that Bond film. The difference is that Brook is much hotter.After a fire on a charter boat, Jennifer (Brook) and her husband Jack (Billy Zane) are stranded along with Manuel (Juan Pablo Di Pace).Now, this is not a good mix by any stretch of the imagination: a hot Latin lover-boy, a beautilicious babe, and a husband that is insanely jealous and full of himself.Things come to a head and they are full at it, trying to kill each other. Who will survive and get the babe? Oh, did you forget Gail (Gabrielle Jourdan)? Not sure she was really necessary, but she was hot! The ending was so sweet.

rsgeorge5 How much do I love this film?! Now I'm not a fan of bad films, but I do love a film that is so bad it's good. This is one of those. Juan Pablo Di Pace has a great butt, looks fab on screen, and definitely doesn't make a bad turn at his acting debut (I believe). Billy Zane is suitably mean and moody, though I still constantly feel that there is something more in him. I felt it in Titanic, the look on his face when La Winslet spat on him for example, totally broken, shocked, and put-down ... fierce! Kelly Brook is a pretty face ... no seriously, I think that's it! It's worth catching this to see one really hot guy, some big bra fillers from Brook, nasty growling from Billy, laugh at the dialogue, revel in the scenery and madness of the whole affair ... I'm gona go watch it again now - yes, I bought it!!!