Incannerax
What a waste of my time!!!
FuzzyTagz
If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.
Megamind
To all those who have watched it: I hope you enjoyed it as much as I do.
Logan
By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
weezeralfalfa
One of several films I'm familiar with that relates to the infamous massacre of peaceful Cheyenne, mostly women and children, at Sand Creek, CO. The historic Chivington, who led this slaughter, is renamed Major Ives(Warner Anderson). However, his hatred of all Native Americans is not changed. Perhaps the most glaring alteration of history is the designation of Chief Red Cloud as the main chief of the Cheyenne, whereas he actually was the most important chief of the Sioux during this period. ...The basic story is that Major Ives plans on building an army fort on Cheyenne land, besides his duty of escorting immigrants through Cheyenne territory, on their way to Oregon. This raises the ire of Red Cloud(whom we never see), and one of his lieutenants: Fire Knife, who uses the presence of his soldiers on their land as an excuse to attack the temporary camp of Ives, which includes some women and other civilians. Most of the soldiers and civilians are killed, but, inexplicably, Ives survives, and journeys with the rest to the nearest fort.....Vagabond scout Adam Reed(Roy Calhoun) happens upon Bostonian Kathrine(Peggy Castle) swimming in the nude in a small lake. Seems she's staying with Major Ives' bunch because her boyfriend is a lieutenant there. After this titillating scene, Reed interacts with her periodically, as he hangs around the camp. After her boyfriend is killed in the Indian attack, she soon latches onto Reed as the man most likely to insure her survival. Eventually, they kiss and hug several times. Given Reed's preferred wandering lifestyle, I'm not sure they have a future together, in which case, Kathren probably will return to the civilization of Boston....A more convincing developing couple consist of Mexican Tonio Perez(Noah Berry) and Nez Pierce maiden Honey Bear(Rita Moreno). As she emphatically states, she's not Cheyenne, who destroyed her native village. Tonio treats her well, thus she sticks with him, despite his perception that she is too young for him. That is, until she saves him from an Indian attacker. Thereafter, he's more accepting of her. Rita provides a beautiful impish presence, being more charismatic than blond Peggy Castle. ....One aspect of the story that doesn't come across as tenable is Major Ives' eventual desperate claim that he is part Cheyenne(and thus should be spared by the Cheyenne, out for vengeance). ....This B&W B western has a cheesy feel to it, but is generally acceptable entertainment. See it on YouTube.... Besides Major Ives, there is another villain on the European side in Peter Graves, as Sawyer. Along with his 2 buddies, he was a gold prospector, presumably on Cheyenne land. They were attacked by Cheyenne, and his one buddy got an arrow to the chest. Sawyer brought him to the army camp. While other's weren't looking, he drove the arrow deeper into his chest, killing him. He later admitted he killed his other partner for the gold. He met his end trying to escape into the bush with his sack of gold, where an Indian was hiding.
drystyx
A lot of the B Westerns were "fluff", but usually the director or writer would want to add some "sidebar" on for their personal motif.It is the "sidebar" that is usually the message the director and writer want to display. Sometimes, it is "advertising" for products, such as tobacco companies, soda companies, or what have you.Here, either Director Selander, or writers Simmons and Boone, looked to want to add their own flavor to a fairly routine cavalry Western.Like most Westerns of the day, the Indians are depicted as semi good guys with evil white men upsetting the apple cart.The overkill of the evil white men has always been very politically correct, and especially was in the decades that followed this movie.However, the real sidebar here is what happens with the evil corrupt cavalry officer who causes at least two massacres, quite knowingly, quite viciously.Also, a few red herrings come into play here. The fates of a few of the characters you won't guess, as they go against the usual Hollywood propaganda formula. Thus, this particular Western has some surprises by the end.
morris vescovi
Major Ives (Warner Anderson), one of the commanding officers of the infamous Sand Creek Massacre ( an actual event) is building a fort in Cheyenne territory. Fireknife(Lee Van Cleef) , tells his friend Adam Reed (Rory Calhoun) to warn the soldiers that they must go or be killed. This is a true act of decency as they know the butcher Ives is in command and they really want him: and revenge for the slaughter he caused. Reed and Fireknife may actually have been blood brothers as they refer to each other as brothers and Reed tells Catherine (Peggy Castle) "the Indians are as much my people as you are." The arrogant Ives won't listen, the Indians attack and the action is unusually violent for it's time. (When Catherine tries to find her former fiancé she says, with a look of horror " I can't tell if it's him") The survivors are forced to go through Cheyenne territory to another fort to reach safety, and this sets up a confrontation between friend Reed and Fireknife.This is another example of a modestly budgeted western with a superior script, very good acting and characters of some depth. Also, the Indians are not the "bad guys". Reed tells Catherine " It might surprise you but Indians love their children and are loyal to their friends." And Fireknife does save his life There is also a very interesting twist in the end which I do not believe has been done before or since. Definitely worth seeing.The film was originally shot in color but only black and white prints were every released on television. This film deserves to be restored.
Patrick Shannon
I happened to have seen this movie this morning on TCM. Very bad acting, low budget and poor plot are the impressions I felt while watching the movie. The only highlight of the movie was watching tender young Rita Moreno, (23 years old), playing a teenage Indian squaw in love with an older man in his 50's. She reminded me of a earlier version of Sue Lyon as Lolita (1962), only a more innocent Lolita. She bounces up and down like a 1950's teeny bopper, almost as if you would expect her to be chewing gum, falling all over this old man, willing to give him anything, as he plays it off like she's a hindrance to him. Any man in his 50's that had a beautiful, virgin, teenage girl willing to do ANYTHING for him and be his bride, would be insane not to take advantage of her. It's too bad that the censorship board back when this movie was released didn't permit more of an expansion of a character such as Rita Moreno's. The only reason why I gave this movie a 3 instead of a 1 is Rita Moreno's appearance in the movie.