CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

PiraBit if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

Plustown A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

SanEat A film with more than the usual spoiler issues. Talking about it in any detail feels akin to handing you a gift-wrapped present and saying, "I hope you like it -- It's a thriller about a diabolical secret experiment."

tieman64 "There has never been a just war. I can see a million years ahead, and this rule will never change. The loud little handful - as usual - will shout for war. The pulpit will - warily and cautiously – object at first; the great, big, dull bulk of the nation will rub its sleepy eyes and try to make out why there should be a war, and will say, earnestly and indignantly, 'It is unjust and dishonourable, and there is no necessity for it.' Then the handful will shout louder. A few fair men on the other side will argue and reason against the war with speech and pen, and at first will have a hearing and be applauded; but it will not last long; those others will outshout them, and presently the anti-war audiences will thin out and lose popularity. Before long you will see this curious thing: the speakers stoned from the platform, and free speech strangled by hordes of furious men who in their secret hearts are still at one with those stoned speakers but do not dare say so. And now the whole nation - pulpit and all - will take up the war-cry, and shout itself hoarse, and mob any honest man who ventures to open his mouth; and presently such mouths will cease to open. Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." - Mark Twain In much of civilisation, the title and the veneer of the "thing" are separate from the actual content of the "thing". Everything is backwards, upside down, doctors destroying health, lawyers justice, universities destroying knowledge, governments destroying freedom, the media and religions destroying information and spirituality and so forth. Human beings are delusion machines, constantly lying to themselves, even on the most basic biological level, and the truth of anything is often the opposite of what is commonly thought at best, at worst also the complete opposite."The War You Don't See" is a powerful documentary by the great John Piger ("War By Other Means") which explores the media's role in selling wars, specifically, the major wars of the last century (WW1, 2, Iraq, Afghanistan etc). What the film reveals is frightening, but of course of little surprise to anyone who studies history: the fourth estate is but a mouthpiece for what has become the corporate state."I don't think we should completely dismiss the words of the second most powerful man in the western world," one news chief says, referring to Dick Cheney, his words epitomising the media's cosy relationship with Power. Far from providing unbiased information, critical and historical analysis, Piger shows, the media hides behind sensationalism, emotion, censors thousands of stories a day, has a clear ideological agenda and couches naked ideology behind a mask of neutrality."We allow the viewers to make up their own minds," another chief remarks, but such neutrality begins a drift away from truth and toward a manufactured landscape of subjectivity and so static; where the media should challenge, ridicule, test with hammers, it deliberately obfuscates.When the news outlets do provide focus, Piger shows, they become merely unthinking stenographers of the 'official word'; sophisticated PR machines. As Edward Bernay, who coined the term "public relations", remarks, "behind the intelligent manipulation of the masses is an invisible government which is the true ruling power in our country." Elsewhere the film interviews journalist Mark Curtis, who details how western governments collude with oppressive foreign regimes and essentially sell evil with sophisticated PR campaigns. "Intended policy," he says, "is based on controlling oil resources, creating an international economy that works in the interests of corporations, and maintaining their power status." Again, hardly news to anyone familiar with history. What's new is Curtis' detailing of the ways in which the journalists who attempt to shed a light on such things are systematically banned or shut out of the mainstream media. Piger knows this well. Many of his films have been similar "banned".Piger then touches upon the symbiotic relationship between the military industrial complex and the major news conglomerates, and lists several major defence contractors who own news channels. As Normon Soloman says, "a military-industrial-media complex now extends to much of corporate media." This unholy alliance is highlighted by Piger with a series of TV clips which feature war junkies fawning and salivating over the "precision" and "efficiency" of modern weapons. The weapons are treated like fetish objects whilst their victims remain unmentioned. Professor Melvin Goodman, former CIA analyst, then explains that pentagon officials have elaborate contracts with news organisations. "80-90% of what you hear and read," he says, "is 'officially' inspired." Piger then interviews Julian Assange who says, "This is not a sophisticated conspiracy. This is a vast movement of self-interests by thousands and thousand of players all working together and against each other to produce an end result. Money and money-making is at the centre of modern war, and it's almost self-perpetuating." Disturbingly, the justification for America's increasingly bloated war machine is listed as "asymmetrical threats which transcend all geographic boundaries." In other words, the US is at war with everything, everyone and anything the state wishes to redefine a target. If the documentary has one flaw, it's in its failure to predict the wars of today and tomorrow, which are fought by Western funded proxy militias at small and slow, daily rates. These continuous wars essentially happen unnoticed, but that's the intention; a handful of murders a day isn't war and so is even less newsworthy.9/10 - Worth one viewing.

poe426 Although the U.$. is currently bogged down in half a dozen wars across the globe, Der Homelanders are being spared the bloody details: news coverage since 9/11 has amounted to nothing less than a self-imposed blackout. If not for people like Pilger and Palast and Amy Goodman (of DEMOCRACY NOW!), we'd STILL be in the dark. Just a week or so after the suicide of Aaron Swartz, we learn that Truthteller Julian Assange is having health problems- related, perhaps, to his confinement (were he to be extradited to the U.$., he would be **** out of luck, indeed: he now has what's euphemistically called "a pre-existing condition" and would no doubt be denied medical treatment here). Swartz was facing a possible 35 years in prison for treason, and opted out. His case bears examination because, even as I write this, legislation is being introduced to make any journalist who makes public any information that a terrorist might read guilty of Espionage. Assange, whose Wikileaks made public the COLLATERAL MURDER video, is THE prime example of a journalist being hounded by an irate government. While few news outlets mention the record number of suicides of veterans or the record number of rapes of female soldiers in the field, journalists who expose such information to the world are being hunted. And television has become a tool of SUPPRESSION. "TV," as Harlan Ellison points out in THE GLASS TEAT, "... is a more effective riot control weapon than tanks or mace or troops." What's wrong with this picture...?

Victor This is, I agree, compulsory viewing. This is the first documentary about the corruption of war by propaganda which serves to progress the argument beyond the usual hysteria. Pilger has, with this film, moved away from the slew of similar-themed documentaries which add little to the debate but more circular arguments. Instead, Pilger goes straight for admissions of guilt. He manages to get some truly frank disclosures of global conspiracy and madness from the most relevant people he could realistically get access to, and for this he deserves the praise.It can be argued, and it will be no doubt, that there is very little material to act as a counterweight to his position in the film. But after you finish watching it, you will hopefully realise what a stupid criticism it is to make in the first place, considering what this documentary is designed to rally against.I won't get into the moral position it presents, as that's up to you in the end, but I'd be hard pushed to find anybody not moved, repulsed or outraged by this film, or all of those things simultaneously. Just watch it. Do it now.

Imdbidia The War you Don't see is a British documentary produced and directed by Australian journalist John Pilger that focus on the dangers of embedded journalism in war times. If journalists do not do their job, we are misinformed and more easily manipulated, we don't see the suffering of innocent civilians and, therefore, we don't oppose the involvement of our governments and Army in those conflicts. The documentary presents many cases in History to proof the point, specially focusing on the Iraq War but showing examples that go from the support of Cigarettes in the media in the 1920s, to the Vietnam War to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, to Wikileaks. It is not as much a critic to those who start and carry out unjust wars, but a warning call to the Journalists, who should be doing their job properly, asking the right questions, investigating things when needed, so we know the truth and act upon it. I loved the documentary. I thought that the Libyan war is showing more of the same, another oil war masqueraded as a free the people war. Pilger makes the right questions, upfront, and does not allow his interviewees to bullshit the public. Pilger is not complacent with his colleagues, not even with the heavy weights of journalism. He does what he asks them to do, and that makes the documentary honest, thrilling, entertaining and informative. However, to be honest, we knew already much of what it is said in it. In fact, there were thousands of people demonstrating against the Iraq War in Australia (and the USA, UK, and the rest of the Western World) calling the arms of mass destruction "arms of mass distraction" despite those embedded journalists believing USA-UK's lies and contributing to their spread. People are sometimes wiser that one could think. The problem is that, once the war starts, and civilians are slaughtered every day, we need to know what we are fighting for. Pilger shows us the nitty-gritty of it, the details, the Monica Lewinski's sort of proof. On the other hand, we do not want to see deceased chopped bodies in our news bulletins in certain countries (I'm just remembering the airbrushing of one of the iconic images of the Madrid Bombings showing severed limbs in most Australian media). I thought that not only the media is guilty of that, but we are guilty too, for not wanting to know the real human drama behind any war, especially if the deceased are not ours.Too many people swallow the news (TV or newspapers) as if they were God's Gospel, without thinking that perhaps the channel they are watching is owned by a filthy rich disgusting guy who is not interested in the truth, but in controlling its spread, so his corporation or businesses do better. Lies make them richer. We have to be honest with ourselves. Lies in the news are easily spread because the level of education of the population is not high enough (in fact, money is more valued than education nowadays), and because independent thinking is not promoted in school, University, or anywhere. Quite the contrary. Everybody wants to be in tune with the social network in vogue. Everybody wants to belong to a flock. So, the problem is not just the sort of journalism we have nowadays, or that the news lie to us regularly, but also the sort of viewers we have nowadays - Viewers who don't question what they hear or see on the news when war is on, or when there isn't even a war. I missed a hint of this point in the documentary, which I consider very important. That would have been moving a step forward from the usual blaming of the Empire, as if our society wasn't to blame for letting others think for us, or swallow crap without any sort of resistance.Said this, the documentary was great, as it proves that we are certainly being lied every day, intentionally or by default, in war times or not. We are told that we are fighting for the freedom of the people, but that is never the case.A wish. I would like Pilger to focus on the crap of ours, the Australian one, and examine closely which sort of news are shown in our TV stations every day, or which sort of crappy newspapers we have in Australia regarding local issues. Why is so? Who are the responsible? What are the lies? Who are the liars?Compulsory watching!