SincereFinest disgusting, overrated, pointless

CommentsXp Best movie ever!

ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

Gutsycurene Fanciful, disturbing, and wildly original, it announces the arrival of a fresh, bold voice in American cinema.

zeidmanart This film is well-written and directed. In between recent interviews of Asian American male actors, writers, directors and critics, is interspersed archival footage showing the roller-coaster ride of these actors. While Sessue Hayakawa, film star and romantic lead, drew big and mixed audiences, others toiled in unfavorable type casting and stereo type. The exclusion laws and World War II took their toll and set back Asian American progress in the film industry. Even worse was the use of non-Asian men in makeup to appear Asian, big in the 30s. Don't miss the discussion panel in the extra features. I think that the interview with James Shigeta is the most informative. All taken, this is a fascinating film.

MartinHafer Unless you are a total jerk, it's hard to watch "The Slanted Screen" without a feeling of sadness. After all, for the most part, Asian parts in American films have been very, very limited. Either, in the old days, they were portrayed in very stereotypical terms by Westerners (such as Charlie Chan and Mr. Moto) or today they have been mostly absent or portray nice geeky folks or kung fu heroes. Asians playing PEOPLE--that has been a serious omission in films. So, as you hear many Asian actors and filmmakers talking about these limitations you can't help but feel for them. Fortunately, things have been getting better...to a point. I was surprised to see that audiences responded poorly even in recent years, for example, to a scene where the Asian hero kissed the non-Asian heroine--so they completely eliminated the romantic aspects of the film--yet it was "Romeo Must Die"--which was based on "Romeo and Juliet"! How can they de-sexualize this plot in order not to 'offend'?! Why is this acceptable but not acceptable if the characters were bi-racial with one white and the other black? A good question--and something you can't help but think as you watch these folks talk about the history of Asians in films and Asians in films today. The film is shown using film clips and lots of interviews and makes its point well. Worth seeing and thought-provoking---even if it is a bit depressing.

piazaag The documentary showd Hollywood portrayal of Asian Americans from the silent file era to today, and it claims that really nothing has changed much during this time. This should be expected since the amount of Asian immigrants coming to this country has steadily increased during this time. I think currently it's still increasing after they lax'd the immigration laws. Of course if there are more and more first generation immigrants, Asian Americans are going to be portrayed like them since they represent the majority. Asian Americans born in the United States are also increasing but at a slower pace, and they are statistically not representative of the majority of Asians in this country, and Hollywood is not going to make that distinction nor should we expect them to. So unless Asian immigration goes down, or the overall quality of those first generation immigrants goes up, neither of which is very likely then we should expect pretty much the same for the next 80 years or so.

maya7-1 Identity politics have repeatedly demonstrated that marginalized minorities hunger for accurate and appropriate cinematic representation. Adachi has successfully satisfied this hunger and accomplished for Asian American males what "The Celluloid Closet" did for its queer constituency and "The Bronze Screen" for Chicanos. The premise of "The Slanted Screen" is articulated in its project summary: "Movies and the mass media help form our world view, shape our identities, and define our roles—on screen and off. Unfortunately, these effects frequently work to the detriment of some groups—including Asian American men. Too often, film and television misrepresent the world they claim to reflect. Their stories revise history, and rationalize inequities. Rather than portraying three-dimensional individuals, their characters manifest prejudice, and reinforce bigotry. Moreover, their ubiquitous and persistent messages encourage viewers to internalize confining definitions of identity and self-worth. Ironically, film and television images extol our fundamental ideals of democracy and equality, and at the same time, betray them." Darrell Hamamoto, Associate Professor of Asian American Studies at U.C. Davis, writes in _Monitored Peril_: "Images of control are used as an iconic shorthand to explain, justify and naturalize the subordination of Asian Americans within a society that espouses formal equality for all." In order to understand history, to situate ourselves within history, we must be engaged by it first and foremost and Adachi has provided an informative, engrossing well-structured vehicle to review how Hollywood's Dream Factory has portrayed Asian Americans from the turn of the century through the turn of the millennium. Utilizing a wealth of clips and interviews Adachi has balanced a recapitulation of representations past with divided concerns over future representation. By its thorough methodology, the documentary achieves solidarity with other minorities in film endeavoring a mutual historical task. It is one of those cases of "enantiodromia", where by diving headlong into the particular concerns of a specific minority, by unveiling "the symbiotic relationship between stereotypes and prejudice", we come out addressing the issues that affect us all, aiming for a society more just for all. That is, at any rate, the hope. "The Slanted Screen" inspires hope that stereotypes might eventually be no longer necessary.