The Sin Seer

2015
3.7| 1h49m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 13 October 2015 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Rose Ricard has a gift, she can see into your soul. She can discern the truth from a lie and sometimes, she can perceive the very thoughts before they are formed in your mind. She uses these gifts to solve unsolved cases and bring closure where there is none. Her most recent case, unwittingly opens the doors to her own past and that of her new partner Grant Summit.

Genre

Drama, Thriller

Watch Online

The Sin Seer (2015) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Paul D. Hannah

Production Companies

The Sin Seer Videos and Images
View All

The Sin Seer Audience Reviews

Plantiana Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.
GamerTab That was an excellent one.
Tobias Burrows It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.
Skyler Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.
Michael Ledo Grant Summit (Isiah Washington) gets out of prison for the crime of??? Something we find out an hour into the film. Rose Ricard (Lisa Arrindell Anderson) who owns a detective agency hires Grant. She knows him because....again another secret that we find out an hour into the film. As an ex-felon he is immediately handed a gun to use for his job in direct violation of Article 54A of the Felony Firearms Act, something the sheriff (C. Thomas Howell) is apparently oblivious to as he hands Grant his firearm back to him. "It's clean."Rose Ricard can read sin in people as well as other feelings. She uses her gift in the agency. We have flashbacks to her overly religious childhood giving the film a quasi-religious feel. Abigail Landers (Angeline-Rose Troy) is looking for her missing boxing husband and uses the skills of Rose Ricard who has Grant drive her around and be her muscle.The acting wasn't there. Lisa Arrindell Anderson was almost emotionless. The twist was ridiculous as was the ending, especially the weak camera angle and lack of realism. The Bible quote contest was a laugh. Director/writer Paul D. Hannah has a long string of mediocre films with this one being a cut below his other works. Fans of Mr. Hannah's previous attempts will certainly love this one too.Guide: No swearing or nudity. Clothed sex scene.
blessedcjc-1 This movie was awful, the story-line was not developed or explained until the end. The cops only appeared in the first half when he shoots the man in Rose's office, after that, they kill a police officer and her sister and no one shows up as they ride into the sunset. Then the supposed twist comes up when she figures out he is the killer and suddenly he is no longer a crack shot but some inept buffoon who doesn't know how to aim. And she kills him, what will she do next, bury him in the fields. NO emotion, no police, just vengeance; for what he was protecting her. NO sense, too cheesy.
ikeybabe Wow, this movie was shockingly bad - so very, very bad! There were some quality actors here - folks who obviously participated in this film as a favor to someone (either that or they were being blackmailed). *Spoiler Alert* The script was chock-full of holes: a convicted felon (Grant killed 3 men right?) can not legally have a firearm, cops don't let civilians simply walk into a crime scene, there is absolutely zero chance the dude in the woods had the capabilities to make fake IDs and passports, when Grant and Rose finally find the man who disappeared (and he just happens to walk into a busy restaurant/bar) the logical step is to brawl with him, of course, and after shooting and killing a business woman and a cop there is absolutely zero chance you get to climb into your car and go home. The whole script was ridiculous and implausible. And, the acting was so awful - the wife of the missing man, the secretary in Rose's office, the bartender. The only positive thing I can say about this film is that the cinematography was well done and the music that played as the end credits rolled was cool.
wdl-07455 I kept feeling the script was a collection of ideas for a script that hurriedly got forwarded as a movie. Like writing a letter and not proof- reading it. I could see some great potential in the story and at times I started to get interested then the script meandered off or came to a dead end. The actors were certainly capable of doing it better but the director seemed to know more about what was going on - in his own mind - but failed to tell the story with his chosen medium. Maybe writing and directing the same movie can get in the way of completeness of the film. Not being from US of A I was unsure of the heavy bias of black people in the scenes - is this the norm for that part of the world - are things really that segregated. Not recommended - even if it's free...