Adeel Hail Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

Beulah Bram A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.

Skyler Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

Jenni Devyn Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.

cristi_lala I mean slasher cause after you see it, you reach for a razor blade to slash your wrist. When all Hollywood movies have a happy ending, Romanian movies have a "kill-myself" ending, haven't seen a single Romanian movie made after '89 that had a happy ending, oh well .. maybe "Asphalt Tango" had a quasi-happy ending.Back on topic, Nae Caranfil manages to capture the 1911 Bucharest atmosphere very accurate. An old civilized world, without vulgar language and gratuitous violence, a time when honor and social statute where extremely important, a time when falling in disgrace of a member took the whole family down with it. Also a world on the dawn of a new era, when corruption started to spread and con-artists began to thrived.What strikes me is that this is not a movie about making a movie, but a love story that takes place while making a movie. Its that kind of movie that makes you think about it days after you see it ! Is Emilia a lead character ? No ! Did she influenced dramatically the lives of the male lead characters ? Definitely yes ! Director Nae Caranfil manages to tell a story within a story which in my opinion this makes hes best movie, one of the best Romanian movies in fact. One minor criticism : German soldiers, which actually where not even Germans as the caption said, they where in fact Austria-Hungarian soldiers, their uniforms looked like Wehrmacht World War II uniforms, especially the combat helmets. Austria-Hungarian helmets had a small sharp vertical spike on top of the helmet. Im not a history buff to dwell on that too much. **** SPOILER INCOMING ****Emilia character, played masterfully by Mirela Zeta, at first looks like its not fully developed as a character, her story has plot holes and loose ends but thats intentional, how can you portray a female character accurate when shes's lying as often as she breathes. She's not a peasant girl that lives in the city as she said in the harvest dance scene. At that time no peasant girl would dare leaving to the city and returning as she pleased without her father beating her senseless. I suspect she was a stowaway among the extras trying to get noticed as an actress by the young director or anyone in the movie industry by a matter of fact. She lies and screws everyone and with everyone that can help her achieve her goal: to become and actress. And she did became an actress, in a theater bought by Leon character for her, in a time where he dint afford that eccentricity. She has a son, who is the father ? Plot hole ? No, it doesn't matter whos the father, mostly because even she doesn't know. Five years passes and the young director Grigore still didn't forget her. He founds a portrait of her, he takes it and he keeps it tight in hes arms like in an embrace. Definitely he loved her more than he shows throughout the whole movie, which fits very well in that age of time, when men didn't showed so transparently how they felt. He loves and hates her at the same time, which can be seen in the scene near the end when he throws a glass of water on her painting in a dual gesture: he threw a glass of water on her face first time she met her and he also threw a glass of water in her face last time he saw her, marking the beginning and the end. Which leads to the final scene: Grigore character doesn't lie in court because Leon actions harmed her ! He lies to punish Leon because he had her. Well done Mr. Caranfil ! Bravo !

Stef First time when i heard about this movie i thought it's gotta be another sad romanian movie with a low budget, but i was wrong! After i saw it, all i can say it's that this movie is one of the greatest romanian movie made in last 20 maybe 30 years. It has great humor, the acting it's very well done and the story-board it's amazing. I didn't knew that romanians are the first who made a long movie.Anyway, from all the movies that i saw this year "Restul e tacere" it's in top 5 of my favorite movies. After i saw it, i decide to buy it! If you want to see it, don't pirate it, buy it!

rusu-4 Or, of course, half empty. I had been waiting for a while for this movie. Really liked Nae Caranfil's other films - especially his last one, Filantropica, a dark and cynical comedy that manages to be both original, funny and thought-provoking. Now, this one is different. Not that it's bad - but it's "serious". It's about the first (or one of the first) movies ever made in Romania, about the war of independence with the Turks. The action is set in 1911, and the events depicted in the "film in the film" had happened some 35 years earlier.The film does avoid the most basic traps - like being overly patriotic. But in my opinion it does not avoid the "folklore" reconstitution of the early 20th century Bucharest. It has all the expected clichés all Romanians know about - like Bucharest supposedly being then a "little Paris". It has some standard characters - "the young idealist", "the hot actress", "the patron of the arts", ... none of which are very believable. It has some pretty heavy metaphors - the "hot actress" gets sprinkled with water twice in the movie, only to die in a fire towards the end ... come on...It also has its good moments. I liked the old generals quarreling about who arrived first on the battle scene, and loved the scene with the King to whom in is explained that the film's director is a kind of an accountant! Another one I liked was the projection of the Independence movie - a bunch of elderly gentlemen in fancy suits getting all excited watching the battle scenes, almost like at a soccer game!I could have ended right there. Unfortunately, it did not - it goes on for another half hour, probably to provide information about the fate of the "film in the film" and of those who made it. And the very last scene nails it to the ground - an actor saying "the rest is silence". Could have included himself in that...So, overall, a disappointment, maybe because I was expecting too much.

marius_em È pericoloso sporgersi, Asphalt Tango, Filantropica... The ingredient are the same: lots of humor on a tragic background. 'Restul e tacere' has the same Caranfil style, and more... Without a doubt, his best work. It's a story about the making of the first Romanian movie in 1911, the age when Bucharest was still 'little Paris', and the national identity feelings were probably at the highest level of all times. Although as a Romanian i felt really close to this movie, i must say there is no over - nationalist propaganda, just a simple decent story with a little bit of history as background, telling us how talent met with business to do the "War of independence" film. The humor is great, the story is a must know, the acting is extraordinary, especially the two main characters (Leon Negrea played by Ovidiu Niculescu and Grigore Ursache played by Marius Florea Vizante), the music is right on cue, the 'little Paris' atmosphere is greatly recreated and the rest is silence...