Matcollis
This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.
Infamousta
brilliant actors, brilliant editing
Gurlyndrobb
While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.
Brennan Camacho
Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.
koopakid-31665
Like i wrote on my review in the first movie, i have a guilty pleasure with shocking and disturbing content, and the first one was underwhelming in that department, but after watching the second one, it was everything i expected from the 1st one. not only was the gore and violence brought to the next level, but the portrayal of
Martin done by Lawrence R. Harvey was (in my opinion) phenomenal, i'm in no way saying that the role was acted better than all other roles played by other actors, i'm saying that he played this role perfectly, to the point where while i was watching the movie, i felt bad for his character (even with all the horrible things he did). for the people who like being shocked for the sake of being shocked, watch this movie, for the people who can look past shocking stuff and enjoy seeing a great portrayal of an insane man, watch it.
Mr-Mingz
What on earth was this supposed to represent?!Movies are supposed to provoke emotion in a creative manner and present an artistic plot easy to understand. Comprehending the plot wasn't the problem, and the only emotion I felt through the entire feature was DISGUST!
If the movie wouldn't scare and revolt you with one plot point, it would follow up with something much worse. The performance from the main character was good regardless of lack of dialogue....but why the actor Lawrence R. Harvey or indeed Ashlynn Yennie from the movie's first installment would want to take part in this horrid feature film 'art' is anyone's guess. Performances can't even save my 1-star review of this abomination.
Scarletfire-1
The sequel is quite different than the first in the series. It is in B&W and is completely unflinching in its depiction of the inhumane treatment the main character issues to his victims. There is a level of shock, and yes revulsion, that you experience as you watch it that would be difficult to duplicate. You do need to be able to completely divorce yourself from what happens in a movie and in reality because what is depicted is nothing but the behaviour of someone who is truly mentally ill.In its own peculiar way, it is a masterpiece - one of the greatest achievements in the history of cinema. Very few people will be able to sit through it, yet one can only give it the highest recommendation to those who feel they are up to the challenge.
skipoc
without a doubt the most tasteless and disgusting film I've ever seen. The first movie at least a semblance of a plot but this crude and nasty "movie" has no plot-it's nothing short of torture porn. The first 30 minutes or so passable but the last third was just revolting. There is no motive other than to show people suffering and being mutilated. I couldn't even watch most of it. Why are people so desperate to work in a movie that they would subject themselves to such degradation? As an actor, there i no amount of money or notoriety that would convince me to do something so horrendous. It's just sick for the sake of being sick. It doesn't even make sense. Martin works in a parking garage to find victims yet no one ever notices his actions or him coming to work covered in blood. Sick, vile and disgusting. The first movie is Citizen Kane compared to this garbage. Tom Six should NEVER be allowed near a computer, a camera or any amount of cash EVER. I would give this minus 10 if allowed.
