NekoHomey Purely Joyful Movie!

Nessieldwi Very interesting film. Was caught on the premise when seeing the trailer but unsure as to what the outcome would be for the showing. As it turns out, it was a very good film.

Neive Bellamy Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

Freeman This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

JLRVancouver Unlike "Winchester 73", the eponymous rifle is only a bit player, as "Springfield Rifle" is about Gary Cooper's character going undercover to get the goods on a Confederate spy ring that is horse-jacking in Colorado. To do so, he volunteers to get ostensibly court-martialed for cowardice to acquire some range-cred with the horse dealer who's behind the heists with the ultimate goal of discovering the mole that is leaking information about the routes the horse conveys are taking. The opening of the film is pretty stiff as the case is made for the value of military espionage in the face of hidebound army brass who don't like the idea of soldiers serving as spies. The rest of the film follows Cooper as he infiltrates, and gradually takes over, the horse thief gang while attempting to discover their contact in the army. The plot seems unnecessarily complicated, with the price of the horses containing concealed map coordinates and the continued undercover work after Cooper has figured out everything except the identity of the mole serves primarily to set up the third act at the cost of lot of soldiers' lives. There is also a minimal and uninteresting subplot involving Cooper's wife and son who aren't in on the charade. The scenery is great and there are a few highlights (Cooper's ensuring that a nemesis won't be riding a horse anytime soon was a 'trick' I'd never seen in a Western before) but overall the movie is just a routine oater set in a Civil War backdrop.

TheLittleSongbird I saw this film as I like films like this and I admire the cast. In most aspects this film delivered. The title is misleading I agree and I personally would've liked Springfield Rifle to have been 5 or so minutes longer. However, while it is not an exceptional movie it is a very good and enjoyable one, and I also think underrated.Springfield Rifle is a very well made film, I loved the scenery and the cinematography is beautiful. It also has strong direction, a rousing music score from Max Steiner that compliments the film perfectly, a good story with an interesting structure and themes and sharp dialogue.Good pacing is also at hand, and the cast are great. Gary Cooper has done better work perhaps, but still gives an engaging performance. Lon Chaney Jnr likewise, and Phyllis Thaxter and Paul Kelly are excellent. Overall, a very enjoyable movie. 8/10 Bethany Cox

polynikes-969-125073 I had a problem with the film's contention that the Springfield rifle was such an effective and awesome weapon. Eleven years after the end of the Civil War, a later-model Springfield was issued to Custer's 7th Cavalry, a weapon that, when fired continually, overheated, causing the soft copper cartridges of that era to expand, thus jamming the ejection mechanism. As may be imagined, this manifestation was not a desirable one. Having to claw and dig out jammed cartridge cases from hot rifle breeches in the face of overwhelming hordes of hostile Lakota and Cheyenne tribesmen, armed with better and more reliable rifles, was a major contributing reason that Custer's command was wiped out.

Spikeopath Depending on what reviews you read of course, Springfield Rifle is either a slowly paced pot boiler or an action packed suspenser. Such is the diversity of this form of the arts, you could easily favour one or the other and nobody could really argue with you. The truth is that André De Toth's film wants to be both, but with an almost dizzying plot and a misleading title, it winds up being an over ambitious picture that doesn't quite pay off on its promise.Gary Cooper stars as Maj. Alex 'Lex' Kearney who gets himself cashiered from the army on a charge of cowardice in order to go undercover to break up a Confederate ring who are stealing horses during the civil war. But Kearney is not the only spy at work so his mission is a touch more complicated than at first thought. Not only that but he is so deep undercover his wife and son believe him to be a real coward and have therefore ostracised him. Oh and the new and war changing Springfield Rifle will have a part to play in the shenanigans.Released in the same year as Cooper was wowing genre fans in High Noon, De Toth's movie does actually feel like an attempt to cash in on the big mans star appeal. However, it should be noted that executives at Warner Brothers didn't want Cooper to play the role, fearing his wholesome image just wouldn't suit a role involving cowardice and double dallying for both parties in the war. De Toth stood by his guns and was rewarded, to my mind, by a film saving performance from Cooper. Frank Davis and Charles Marquis Warren adapt from a story written by Sloan Nibley (who is noted in the genre for his numerous work on Roy Rogers scripts), Max Steiner provides the score and Edwin B. DuPar photographs out of Lone Pine and Warner Ranch in California. The film is not shot in Technicolor {as stated by some reviewers}, it was shot in the Warnercolor process. With the result somewhat pleasing on the eye, notably the uniforms of the soldiers and the flame engulfed sequence towards the finale.The support cast are fair to middling. Lon Chaney Jr. is sadly a shadow of his former self, tho a good old dust up with Cooper raises the temperature. Phyllis Thaxter, David Brian, Paul Kelly & Philip Carey file in and say their lines. While Guinn 'Big Boy' Williams & Alan Hale Jr. deserved more screen time than they actually got. With surprises in the plot and Cooper adding some quality, Springfield Rifle is entertaining enough. But ultimately it ends up being a modest genre piece that really should have been much much better. 6/10