Dynamixor The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Sienna-Rose Mclaughlin The movie really just wants to entertain people.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

BA_Harrison Take two excellent comedic actors-Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder-and a brilliantly simple premise-a blind man and a deaf man are wrongly suspected of a murder- and what you have is See No Evil, Hear No Evil, a side-splitting farce in which the disabled pair, Wally (Pryor) and Dave (Wilder), have to try and prove their innocence by tracking down the real villains (played by sexy Joan Severance and Kevin Spacey).With Wally unable to see and Dave having to lip read, the scene is set for some incredibly funny knockabout comedy and hilarious verbal interchanges, ably handled by veteran director Arthur Hiller (who also worked with Pryor and Wilder on Silver Streak in 1976).There are way too many funny moments to list, but my favourites are when Dave misunderstand's bad-tempered cop Braddock (Alan North), thinking he has said 'Fuzzy Wuzzy was a woman', and Wally, posing as a Swedish gynecologist, giving a talk on multiple orgasms in geriatric women!Also worth a mention: Severance's shower scene (the actress going topless) and Kevin Spacey's facial cyst (the actor had it removed soon after, but here it is so big that it deserves a screen credit all of its own).7.5 out of 10, rounded up to 8 for IMDb.

TheLittleSongbird While a box office success at the time, 'See No Evil, Hear No Evil' was very negatively received critically and, while it has its defenders, many still consider it a lesser Gene Wilder/Richard Pryor effort.From personal opinion, 'See No Evil, Hear No Evil' doesn't see Wilder and Pryor at their best. Of their four double act collaborations, my personal favourite is 'Silver Streak' while also really enjoying 'Stir Crazy' mostly (where the partnership between the two is more equal and even more inspired) if not as even (with a second half that doesn't fare as well as the first half). At the same time, 'See No Evil, Hear No Evil' doesn't disgrace either Wilder or Pryor and doesn't hurt what made their chemistry so enjoyable in the first place. It's not a great film, but to me it is nowhere near as bad as reputed and a better film than their last collaboration 'Another You'.'See No Evil, Hear No Evil' has its good things. It's hardly a cheap-looking film, it's nicely shot and cohesively edited mostly. The music is a good, sometimes quirky, never over-bearing and rarely mismatched, fit.Not everything works here material-wise but some lines are funny, Pryor especially has some gems, and there are a few amusing gags. The concept of the story is a quite unique one, and despite some worries as to how it would turn out, the film treats the concept nowhere near as distastefully as feared. Not everything comes cleverly and there is a lack of taste and subtlety at times but there really has been far more offensive content.Like with their previous two collaborations, Wilder and Pryor are a well-matched double act and both enjoy themselves and give good performances as well as being convincing in their characters' handicaps. Although with a less understated and louder character, meaning that he could easily have fallen into the trap of being annoying, Pryor does provide some very nice moments, but Wilder's gentler in comparison performance is no less inferior and doesn't resort to mugging.Quite a lot is lacking however, or at least from personal view, in 'See No Evil, Hear No Evil'. While Wilder and Pryor are good, the supporting cast are less so. Alan North fares least badly. Joan Severance has sex appeal and allure going for her but exudes little threat or much personality for that matter, and to say that Kevin Spacey in a very early role went on to much better things later on than his too-silly-to-be-taken-seriously is being very kind.Scripting has its moments, as said, but too many of the jokes (even for the kind of the comedy it was going for and the film's concept) were far too juvenile and some so idiotic it nearly insults the intelligence. The story has an interesting idea but it became confused and contrived the more it went on (especially the caper element that was nearly completely lost amongst the humour).Erratic pacing (sometimes too hectic, at other times suffering from a lack of urgency) and the chaotic, and like it belonged more in a cartoon, action does no favours either.In conclusion, okay film if not great. Not that bad, while not with enough to passionately defend it either. 5/10 Bethany Cox

RbDeraj I was thoroughly impressed with this movie. The writing and the script were wonderfully done with witty remarks and hilarious scenarios that kept the laughs nonstop. But it wasn't all fun and games as they also added other serious elements to make the story more heartfelt. The duo's chemistry was flawless as they bonded over their struggles and disabilities. Gene Wilder and Richard Pryor executed their roles perfectly and made a very convincing blind and deaf man. It was also interesting to see a young Kevin Spacey before his career took off. I will have to see some more of Wilder and Pryor's collaborations. Exceptional film.

mark.waltz You definitely have to have a "Family Guy" type of humor to like this somewhat tactless film about a deaf man (Gene Wilder) and his blind store clerk (Richard Pryor) who are accused of murder and go on the run to expose the real criminals. When Pryor's bookie is murdered inside Wilder's Manhattan convenience store (while his back is turned and Pryor hears the gunshots), it is obvious that they will end up being accused, and the absence of their different senses draws them together as they must support each other and communicate only through Wilder's ability to read lips and Pryor's ability to hear. A combination of both a "Road" movie and Mel Brook's "High Anxiety" (already a spoof itself, of Hitchcock films), this utilizes much tactless humor to give us the adventure which leads up to the obvious conclusion. While "High Anxiety" took Brooks and Madeline Kahn all over San Francisco, this film gives us a look at late 80's Manhattan, from the very lower east side, an obvious under construction West Side Highway and ultimately somewhere in New Jersey. The chase seen is to this film what San Francisco was to "Bullitt", and it never lets you look away. Pryor and Wilder don't have the good material here that they had in "Silver Streak" and "Semi-Tough", but unless you are too politically correct to enjoy a good laugh at the expense of the handicapped, you will find yourself embarrassed by laughing. Wilder's character, in particular, is an angry deaf man, and the initial meeting between him and Pryor (plus a later fight between the two of them and a bully in a bar) are truly angry in the way they deliver their humor. Kevin Spacey is one of the villains.