KnotStronger
This is a must-see and one of the best documentaries - and films - of this year.
Neive Bellamy
Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.
Darin
One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.
bluedionysus
This must be one of those "5 or 6 films" Stockard Channing is too embarrassed to mention having worked on in interviews. Which is partly a shame - because, with some serious tinkering ("How about tinkering us up a new engine?" complains David Carradine early on), SAFARI 3000 could've been a genuinely enjoyable ride. Harry Hurwitz' comedy-adventure takes more than a little inspiration from SMOKEY AND THE BANDIT and Paul Bartel's DEATH RACE 2000 and CANNONBALL - as well as a bit from Blake Edwards' THE GREAT RACE, Disney's THE LOVE BUG, and even Friedkin's SORCERER. You get the picture. The primary difference here is that Hurwitz transposes the action - a treacherous, long-distance auto race, involving varied, eccentric participants - to sub-Saharan Africa.The main issue with SAFARI 3000 is the script. Four writers (three for story, and one for screenplay)... that's rarely a good sign. The dialogue, in particular, is unusually stilted at times, and the story undoubtedly required a few more rewrites. Running barely an hour and a half, it appears significant portions of the film were also truncated, further harming the picture... or serving as a stroke of mercy, depending on one's outlook. Finally, for something so ambitious, the movie could have used some additional car stunts and the like.However, SAFARI 3000 does have its charms, and doesn't quite deserve the obscurity it has always suffered. Admittedly, I do say that as a Channing obsessive. The film was gloriously shot on-location, and there are several encounters with wildlife that are alternately intense and wonderful. The widescreen cinematography (by Adam Greenburg, and badly hurt by pan & scan - when isn't it ever?) is nicely evocative of the surroundings (including some beautiful scenery), and Ernest Gold's jovial score isn't bad.Furthermore, there's an amusingly hammy, Darth Vader-looking Christopher Lee, as villain Count Borgia, who pretentiously claims to be a descendant of that most infamous of families, and is accompanied by a ridiculously masochistic sidekick (Hamilton Camp). And, of course, there's the palpable chemistry between Carradine and Channing, who presumably do better when ignoring the script and begin ad-libbing and interacting instinctively with one another. Carradine featured in both DEATH RACE 2000 and CANNONBALL, so this is familiar territory for him. And Channing once again proves herself to be as accomplished a comedic actress as a dramatic one. The woman can do it all. Scenario-wise, some of the comedy works on a farcical level, while other parts are simply farcical.If you're a fan of Stockard Channing, David Carradine, Christopher Lee, safari rallies, and/or slapstick-type comedy, it really wouldn't hurt to check out SAFARI 3000. It would even be perfectly suitable for children were it not for one brief sex scene (unfortunately not involving Stockard!)
MARIO GAUCI
Made in the wake of THE CANNONBALL RUN (1981), this racing-car comedy actually features David Carradine in the lead, who had starred in the similar (but more violent) DEATH RACE 2000 (1975) and the unrelated CANNONBALL (1976). The heroine, then, is Stockard Channing and the villain Christopher Lee – appearing here in a silly Darth Vader get-up, albeit claiming to be a descendant of the Borgias and irritatingly prone to opera singing, not to mention being flanked by an unfunny and long-suffering "navigator"! The African setting allows both ample travelogue footage and, ostensibly, added peril for the contenders; that said, the race itself is curiously lacking in excitement and, besides, while we are told there are as many as 93 participants, we only ever see a handful of stereotype members (Brits, French, Japanese, Australians and one female team) apart from the central rival duo…who, needless to say, end up neck-and-neck near the finishing line but, unsurprisingly, Carradine and Channing emerge victorious in spite of Lee's every attempt to thwart their progression. Incidentally, this could have taken a leaf from the "Wacky Races" cartoons of the late 1960s, itself inspired by THE GREAT RACE (1965) – that is to say, it should have been broader, but perhaps the film-makers did not want to go the route of THE CANNONBALL RUN…which rather let the result fall between two stools, hence s virtual obscurity since its year of release! While it is watchable enough for what it is, especially as the picture runs for a mere 86 minutes, there is hardly anything memorable going on for the entire duration – which makes the involvement of renowned producers Jules V. Levy and Arthur Gardner (their last effort) and Oscar-winning composer Ernest Gold all the more baffling!
imdb-21622
So, it's a rally movie. From my own experience, the rally movie craze started with the real life rally Canonball Baker Sea-To-Shining-Sea Memorial Trophy Dash. Brock Yates, a Car and Driver writer created the race to protest the double nickle national speed law.Inspired by this event there have been a number of movies. The main list is probably Canonball (76), Gumball Rally (76,) The Canonball Run (81).Before those was another Carradine car movie, Deathrace 2000. Carradine was also in Canonball.Which brings us to this 1981 "classic", Safari 3000.This movie is not like those other movies in some ways. It focuses mostly on the Carradine/Channing team, and their nemesis, a count.The movie is innovative in no obvious way. That's not a terrible strike against it, how many movies are? The movie is a comedy/adventure. So it should be funny. And it is, in spots. I laughed more at the clichéd lines than anything else, which is fine. I don't mind laughing AT a movie, as that's also legitimate entertainment.Don't expect much for adventure. It's not like Indiana Jones or similar movies. You never feel like the protagonists are in any real danger. I hope that's intentional, or the movie makers are pretty bad at creating real tension.This all sounds like I am down on this movie. In fact, I sat and watched most of it. That means I was entertained. I don't love Carradine but he has his moments. Channing is cute at times, and pretty likable. Reminds me a bit of Sally Field in Smokey in the bandit - a cute chick riding along in the car with a cute voice and a cute personality.If you dig 80s cheese, rally movies and comedy-adventures with more silliness than substance, you might like this. And there's some nice scenery of African animals I thought was well done.
chinaskee
In the tradition of " Cannonball Run " and " The Great Race " " Safari 3000" tells the basically simple story of a African continent road race. It's not a classic and there aren't any great stunts but all the actors ( Stockard Channing and Hamilton Camp in particular) look like they're having a roaring good time with the silly dialogue and consequently so will you. There are a couple of raunchy lines that will go right over the kiddies heads so it's one for the entire family. Lots of wild animals and some natives who are aren't as primitive as they appear, actors having a great time, all in all a fun way to spend an hour and a half. Of course, as in all low budget movies there are some unintentially funny moments, like the African used car dealer at the beginning who only gets his accent down in the second half of his scene.
