Cubussoli Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Solidrariol Am I Missing Something?

Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Lollivan It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Raymond In a way I waited for about 30 years to see this movie and finally caught it on a local art house cinema. It was shown from a 16mm print. Even in the 80s when I was a kid and growing up with the movies this had a bit of a cult reputation. Very violent, so no one was allowed to see it so it became a bit of a curiosity. Later I just never ran across it, no video or dvd rental seemed to have it nor was it shown in TV. Later I have also built up a major affection for 70s sci-fi movies, especially those that have something to say, so I was pretty excited to see it.So.. did it live up to the expectations I had built? Not really. The rollerball action scenes were amazing and I was very drawn into the movie early on. Very well made. But when the actual plot started to reveal, I kind of lost interest. The movie is about corporations ruling the globe and the corporations apparently don't like the fact that a rollerball player (James Caan) is starting to gain individual following and hero status over a "team effort". So they try to get him to retire and as he doesn't want to, they change the game rules to get him out of the game "natural way". James Caan's character starts to question the whole system and goes on to find answers and keeps playing.It kind of sounds interesting, but it never really is. The motives - for everyone - are pretty vague. We don't see much of anything about the so called dystopian future, so it's difficult to put any actions into a proper context. Why don't the executives just ditch Caan, he gets to play as if no one really cares if he plays or not. The same when he goes to an "all knowing" computer to seek answers. He just walks in. But doesn't get any answers. The whole scene is pretty awkward.The music is also somewhat overly dramatic many times with well known classical pieces like Albinoni adagio. They kind of work, but then again they don't quite fit every time.There are good stuff too. The cinematography is amazing by Douglas Slocombe, one of my favorite cinematographers. There are very nicely directed scenes, very effective stuff. I'm not a huge action fan, but the rollerball scenes were very well done.So definitely a mixed bag. I wouldn't rate this among the best dystopian future movies, but it's nevertheless an interesting catch. Maybe it would require another go to really get into it.

edwagreen The films dealing with a futuristic society have a tendency to go way overboard and this 1975 film is no exception.It comes down to rollerball player James Caan fighting the executives of the corporation who control this outrageous sport attempting to force him into retirement at the height of his career.Fresh off his supporting Oscar win 2 years before for "Paper Chase," John Houseman again comes across as a pompous domineering executor whose very sinister appearance spells doom.As the rules change, the sport in question becomes far more violent and at this point the film goes further down in quality.

capone666 Rollerball (1975)The upside to corporate sponsorship is no more arguments over what to name the new arena.However, this sci-fi movie maintains commercial backing in sport is detrimental.In 2018, big business has replaced war with an equally bloody diversion called Rollerball.But when the reigning rollerball champ, Jonathan (James Caan), refuses to retire as per the league's request, the head of the Energy Corporation (John Houseman) manipulates the rules of rollerball in hopes that an opponent will kill the veteran skater.As the risk increases so too does Jonathan's determination to topple the privileged plutocracy.An effective account of a corporate run society, this adaptation of a dystopian short story still stands as a shining example of man versus materialism. And while the violence may seem tame, the message is anything but.Thankfully, we live in a world where corporations have absolutely no influence over the winner of Bud Bowl.Yellow Lightvidiotreviews.blogspot.ca

poe426 I don't have to tell anyone who's made it this far that ROLLERBALL, in retrospect, seems prescient. Corporate team sports have become the norm, with athletes proudly adorning themselves with corporate logos and tap-dancing to the tunes of their corporate masters as fast as they can. (There may come a time when the corporations will require the athletes they sponsor to tattoo the company logo on their hides...) Individuality (of the sort found in sports like boxing) has pretty much fallen by the wayside, for the most part (the odd fight turns up on cable or pay-per-view, but NEVER on Corporate Networks any more; and only superstar fighters with Brand Names are known to the general public). Jonathan E is the Muhammad Ali of his era, an individual who stands out- and, like the proverbial nail that must be hammered down, he finds himself under assault from The Corporation(s). Like the so-called Rules of Engagement meant to lessen the murder(s) in warfare, there are penalties in Rollerball, but those penalties are waived in response to Jonathan's celebrity to allow for greater carnage- which the Rollerballers promptly deliver (like the grunts who kill nowadays in the name of Corporations). Whether it's Team Sports like football or basketball or the military, it's ALL carefully designed to foster The Group Mind approach to winning. It's the individual who's NOT a Team Player that must be hammered down.