ManiakJiggy This is How Movies Should Be Made

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Rosie Searle It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Catherina If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

Scarecrow-88 A coastal Maine town is rocked by two vicious murders to traveling females which are similar to the deaths within a visiting troubled writer's novel, "The Reaper".Famous novelist Luke Sinclair(Chris Sarandon), notorious for his grisly, detailed violence in his books, is struggling through writer's block deciding to get away for a spell hoping to tap into the primal side that unleashes the creativity which yields the stories that have made him such a success. He believes we all have an ability, primal, to kill, but many of us know how to control it. Government sends a forensic pathologist, Sonya Lehrman(Catherine Mary Stewart) to the town to assist the sheriff's department in the case. Sheriff Norris(Vlasta Vrana)doesn't make it easy for Sonya, as he's not used to being ordered around "by a girl." Sonya tries to cope with Norris' "backwards ways" while trying to find the serial killer before he copycats the final murder from the "Reaper" novel. Luke seems to know a great deal about how the murders might've occurred as Sonya interviewed him, probing his thoughts and feelings on the two open cases. His boozing, and not taking prescribed pills to assist a mental disorder certainly don't help Luke's standing while a killer is being pursued. Understanding the psychology of the killer also makes him an ideal suspect. Slowly Sonya begins to develop feelings for Luke as his life begins to crumble due to alcoholism, a souring marriage, and media coverage of his possible criminal involvement in a double-murder case. The film also offers a possibility of Sheriff Norris' less than polished career as a Boston detective and certain knowledge of a tattoo found on the second victim.To be honest, without some nudity(..the sight of two naked bodies, not exactly elaborating too much as the director does a good job of removing the camera shortly after we first see them)and coarse language, "Reaper" actually plays like a Lifetime movie. The violence in this film is more discussed in details than shown. The film is quite dialogue, and performance driven. It's overall a detective thriller with multiple red herrings used to throw the viewer of the scent of who the killer really is. Some soapy melodrama thrown in with Luke and Sonya's developing feelings adding a bit of spice to the proceedings.

Lucien Lessard Luke Sinclair (Chris Sarandon) is a controversial crime novelist, who writes his criminals so vividly on his books. Despite he never really study on the subject. But his latest book is due and he owns his publisher a new book. Since Luke can't think of anything, because he has writer's block. He decides to leave on a trip by himself to finish his novel in a small quiet town, somewhere in the state of Maine. But soon, he finally arrives for a room. There's a murder that happen in that night and he becomes the number one suspect by the local sheriff (Vlasta Vrana). But what makes the murder so weird, that a page of his best selling book "Reaper" was found near the dead body. Now a female FBI investigator (Catherine Mary Stewart) is soon on the case as well, she soon finds Luke a suspect also. Is this could be the work of a crazed murderer, who's a fan of Sinclair's work or Sinclair is actually the killer himself ? Directed by John Bradshaw made an slightly above average thriller with some unexpected suspense and thrills. Although this feels like a TV movie at times and it's routine plotted as well but the actors do a good job with their performances. It's intriguing enough to not get bored by this film. Fans of the genre will enjoy this one best. Worth a look, especially if u catch this one in cable late-night. (*** ½/*****).

Theo Robertson Chris Sarandon plays Luke Sinclair a writer of horror novels so controversial he occasionaly finds himself becoming the victim of assault which led me to ask how would a writer be so infamous that he`dsuffer from this type of hatred ? It`s similar to Liam Neeson`s character in THE DEAD POOL , a director of horror films so violent he`s treated as a danger to society . Is there any film maker so unpopular they`d find themself a hate figure ? Mind you I sometimes get nasty PMs from people who disagree with my reviews on this site and I do know many people who write far less subjective or polemical reviews who continually receive nasty hurtful comments . I guess there`s a lot of nasty people around and a writer being assaulted by self styled moral guardians isn`t as far fetched as it first seemed As for the rest of REAPER it`s far from being a classic thriller and it does suffer from one too many plot twists at the end , but I don`t think it`s as bad as it could have been either . To the film`s credit Luke Sinclair is written and played as an unlikable anti hero unlike many of these thrillers where a writer is the main character , and despite a slightly cliched view of hick small town cops at least you recognise why they suspect Luke might have something to hide being a writer who writes about viscous murders

brude2000 An alcoholic horror novelist (Chris Sarandon), suffering from writer's block, agonizes over his next novel while a real-life serial killer stalks small-town Maine. Catherine Mary Stewart and Vlasta Vrana co-star as the cops on the trail, but the real mystery here is why these three talented actors accepted a payday in this anaemic, sleep-inducing whodunit. I guess it was just that -- a payday.Maine's premiere horror novelist, Stephen King, has nothing to fear from this Canadian thriller (and I use that word loosely) -- there are enough red herrings and telegraphed punches here that director Bradshaw should have issued a spoiler warning. You don't need Sherlock Holmes to solve this one.