Porky Chops

1949
6.2| 0h7m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 12 February 1949 Released
Producted By: Warner Bros. Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Lumber jack Porky Pig intrudes upon the peace of a hipster squirrel vacationing in the Northwoods by trying to chop down the squirrel's tree. The squirrel retaliates by enclosing the base of his tree with steel so that Porky's axes cannot penetrate. The ensuing conflict between Porky and the squirrel awakens an angry bear.

Genre

Animation, Comedy

Watch Online

Porky Chops (1949) is currently not available on any services.

Cast

Mel Blanc

Director

Arthur Davis

Production Companies

Warner Bros. Pictures

Porky Chops Videos and Images

Porky Chops Audience Reviews

Softwing Most undeservingly overhyped movie of all time??
Neive Bellamy Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.
Tayyab Torres Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.
Cristal The movie really just wants to entertain people.
phantom_tollbooth Cult director Arthur Davis has made some hysterically funny cartoons in his time but 'Porky Chops' sure ain't one of 'em! One of the ugliest, most unfunny Warner shorts I have ever seen, 'Porky Chops' is something of an oddity. Its problems are numerous. For a start, it is very poorly paced and full of misfiring gags. The animation is clunky and the character designs are unattractive. This is especially true of the one-shot squirrel character who spends the cartoon trying to prevent Porky from cutting down his tree. Aside from looking lousy, this squirrel is a thinly veiled re-imagining of Bugs Bunny. Come to mention it, Porky's role in this film could just as easily have been played by Elmer Fudd and there are even moments when, if you squint, Porky looks just like Elmer in his hunting hat and brandishing his gun. As he was replaced by more interesting characters, Porky's starring roles became rarer and even in his earlier cartoons he frequently played second fiddle to crazier characters (see 'Porky's Party', in which Porky barely gets a look in). Chuck Jones brilliantly injected new life into him by casting him opposite Daffy in several inspired genre spoofs but Davis's attempt to throw the spotlight on the fame-starved pig falls completely flat. 'Porky Chops' is as pitiful as its dreadful title would suggest.
ccthemovieman-1 A city-wise squirrel is resting comfortably in his new vacation-type room in the middle of a big tree trunk in the Northwest. He's from Flatbush and has his "Brooklyn Dodgers"pennant tacked on the wall. As he is getting ready for his first long nap, he hears what he thinks is a woodpecker. However, he soon realizes it isn't: it's some "lumberjackson" down below chopping the tree (Porky Pig). "One of the local yokels," he says. "I'll fix that icky."I don't what all the complaints are here. I thought this was very entertaining. The squirrel was a "hipster" that had many dated-but-funny lines. That alone made this worth watching. Some of ploys to keep Porky from chopping the tree down weren't bad, either.Whoever this squirrel was, it was really HIS cartoon, not Porky's.
Lee Eisenberg Arthur Davis, who directed "Porky Chops", was most famous as an animator; maybe he just didn't have exactly what it takes to be a director. This cartoon is pretty funny - hell, it looks like "Citizen Kane" compared to some of the cartoons coming out today - but it mostly seems to be a one-joke premise, as Porky Pig tries to chop down a tree but the wise-guy squirrel using it as his vacation home keeps interfering.So, it's not a great cartoon, but still good for a few laughs...particularly with what happens after the dynamite gag (the Termite Terrace crowd sure had a way with dynamite, didn't they?).PS: The name "The squirrels of Central Park" originally came from Gary Larson's cartoon "The Far Side". The squirrel here reminded me of that.
Wizard-8 Even if you were not to know who the director and the writers were before watching this cartoon, it's almost certain that you would start suspecting none of the usual gang at the Warner Brothers animation studio were behind this entry. What we have here are writers who worked at the studio only for a brief time, and a director who was more successful as an animator. The end result is very strange, feeling like it was done by people who had only seen a handful of Looney Tunes cartoons before being assigned to make this cartoon. They have the words, but not the music - the timing is very off, and they don't seem to understand how the characters (both the protagonist and antagonist) need to act. I agree with the previous poster that this was an odd choice for Warner Brothers first box set of Looney Tunes cartoons - it certainly is no classic. Still, I must admit it shines when placed next to some of the cartoons that came out of the cartoon studio during its dying days.