SpuffyWeb Sadly Over-hyped

XoWizIama Excellent adaptation.

Matylda Swan It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties.

Payno I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

tsos-88328 I've seen these Bigfoots. Not so impressive. You is dumb. You is dummy. Explain the plantain. Nobody is do. What it is. What it was. Such? You dig.

oldsloughstalker For almost 50 years, the debate on whether or not that this vintage film is genuine footage of a real animal is still alive and well. Hopefully, this submission will shed some light to the novice on this subject, as well as some of the skeptics. As an experienced outdoorsman, my honest opinion is that the footage shows a living animal. I will not bias anyone's opinion by stating any of my many reasons for this conclusion. However; for those who may think otherwise, such as that this may simply be a hoax, or footage of a man in a mask and costume ... let's try a little experiment.First of all, please watch the footage and pay close attention to the subject in the film, especially its head. Please notice that as the subject walks away from Roger Patterson through the creek-bed as it is being filmed (which is very rugged terrain, I might add) that not once does it ever look down. Now for the experiment, which I have tried several times with the general public at outdoor wildlife expos: I have asked participants to put on an over-the-head gorilla mask and then briskly walk away from me until I instruct them to stop. I generally let the participant travel between 10-15 yards away before stopping them, and then immediately turn to my audience of "witnesses" and ask them, "How many times did the subject look down?" The answer averages 3 to 5 times by audience response for each time that I have tried this experiment.So now, my question to you the reader is ... how can a man in a mask and bulky costume possibly traverse that rocky and uneven of terrain without either looking down or tripping? It was hard enough for Roger Patterson to pursue the animal while filming, all the while trying to keep focused on the subject as well as focusing on where he himself was going. For a novice photographer with an unfamiliar rented camera, I feel that Roger did a fairly good job of filming considering the circumstances. Thank you for your time and interest in this film, and I hope that this review will help you to form your own opinion on its authenticity.

TravisBrain i have always followed the stories of mysterious monsters, be it loch Nessie monsters, abominable snowmen, the Bigfoot creature or Irish midgets and their pots of gold. naturally i was very interested in this film: it is a document on the legend of the Bigfoot creature. my only wish is that the film was made years later, for it could have interviewed me about my encounter with the abnormal beast. it happened in 1996 when i was on a camping trip shooting grouse in the forests of Americana. as i trudged through the forest, i became aware of a human like form in the undergrowth and immediately knew it was Bigfoot. i jumped on the creature and wrestled it to the floor, but the creature was too strong for me and made good its escape after kicking me in the shin. my friend Adam took a photo of my shin shortly after the incident, and the evidence is there for all to see: the picture depicts what is undoubtedly a Bigfoot toe print indelibly imprinted into the purple swollen flesh of my shin.

oreamnos1 Genuine, not fake, film of a Sasquatch. ONE OF A KIND film that has never been repeated. An utter million-in-one-shot lucky fluke that Patterson happened on this creature while out shooting a documentary in the open in broad daylight. He did not even have a telephoto lens on the camera (unfortunately) as he was prepared for shooting scenic views. Contrary to the utter nonsense one poster left here, the film has NEVER been shown to be a fake NOR did Patterson ever confess to having faked it. There is no deathbed confession. Claim by a Hollywood effects person to having faked it has no merit. The reality is that, when the image is blown up and the central portion of the image is enlarged, a frame-by-frame viewing shows substantial muscle action in the legs of the Sasquatch. How does one fake that? Especially as it was shot in 1967 and filmed by a guy who possessed meager financial resources - and no known connection to Hollywood special effects personnel.