katekaron
Just as a reminder to anyone just now reading the comments on this excellent BBC mini-series, published in 1981, it was not available on DVD until the last few years. Since then, it has become available, but initially only in the British format (for which I bought an 'international' DVD player, which you have to hack--illegally, I suspect, to see it), but the series is now available through amazon.com--3 discs-- for between $19-21, to be viewed on DVD in the US format, no hacking. There were 41 reviews, average 5 stars. This mini-series is one of the very best on Oppenheimer, or the Manhattan Project, or virtually anything produced by the BBC.
princepsaugustuscaesar
'Oppenheimer' with Sam Waterston in the title role and with David Suchet as Evard Teller is an example of the docudrama at its very finest. Well written, well acted by actors who bear a believable resemblance to their historical characters, highly informative, and very entertaining. The set designs and costumes capture the feel of the US during World War 2, and the plotting and dialog make the viewer feel as if he were really present at Los Alamos and caught up in the excitement of the Manhattan Project. The only downside is that this is a British production, and some of the actors lack skill in affecting a convincing American accent. (The skill of current day Australian & Irish actors taking on non-native dialects is amazing.) The storyline is fully consistent with Richard Rhodes' definitive history of the development of the atomic bomb. Sadly, the mini-series was shown only a couple of times on PBS at the beginning of the 1980s and then apparently vanished into oblivion.'Oppenheimer' compares favorably to the more recent 'Fat Man & Little Boy' feature film with Paul Newman as Leslie Groves (the chronically overweight and rather homely General would be thoroughly flattered) and Dwight Schultz (alumnus of TV's 'A-Team') as Oppenheimer. As a mini-series, 'Oppenheimer' is around 4x as long as the Newman feature, but uses the all of the additional time completely to its advantage.
Robert J. Maxwell
Like an earlier commenter, I saw it in 1980 and have never been able to shake the memory of the gripping story and splendid acting. The dramatic score by Carl Davis is majestically bombastic, as befits a story about a bomb, and hard to forget. The film certainly contains some of Sam Waterston's finest work. He and the writers depict Oppenheimer not simply as an unjustly victimized hero -- which he was -- but also as naive, fond of alcohol, given to mixing with the wrong women and the wrong political crowd, and snobbish, a rounded portrait instead of a stereotype.Dozens of scientists are gathered together in the New Mexico desert to work on the first atomic bomb. Oppenheimer runs the brains, but the general in charge of the overall operation -- building the bomb, building the buildings, maintaining security -- is Leslie Groves, the Grand Panjandrum who pronounces Russians as "Roosians". He's an engineer and constantly worried that these commie eggheads are doing too much talking and not enough work. "We've got the finest scientists in the WORLD," he crows, "and they're all OURS." They include immigrants, many of them Jews, from Italy, Hungary, Britain, Germany, and so forth, as Oppenheimer points out. "Yes -- but they all come HERE!", shouts groves, indignant and puzzled.All of the characters are as complex as they would be in real life. We see plenty of Oppenheimer's anguish as he obeys the military. But in many ways, the figure of General Leslie Groves (Manning Redwood) is the most interesting because his complexity is reduced to a point that renders it easy to grasp. We, as adults, can empathize with ambiguity better than we can understand the simple single-mindedness of a child.He's a chauvinist and a moral nihilist. Instead of a dozen scientists cooperating on different parts of the bomb, he wants to seal them off from each other to enhance security, which is anathema to these idealists. One can easily imagine a heroic John Wayne in the role. "It's INTERESTING? I don't want something interesting; I want a BOMB." (Groves is usually shouting.) He seems almost to set out to make a buffoon of himself in the eyes of all these academics. One of his exit lines from an argument is that he doesn't have a Ph.D. like the rest of them but he's spent eleven years in military administration and construction. "Let's see. That's the equivalent of two Ph.D.s, isn't it?" He leaves the eggheads agog as he sweeps through the door because the only thing that matters to them is their brilliance and the usefulness of their contributions to the project.And when the gadget is finally used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and everyone is watching films of the destruction -- both cities laid waste; prisons, schools, hospitals and individuals vanished -- the scientists are thoughtful and silent. Not General Groves. He's jumping for joy. "One bomb did all that -- and it's OURS!" One hundred and fifty four prisoners dead in their cells? "Right on the BUTTON!" Later he chides Oppenheimer for his remorse, assuring him that he'll get over it. But, as adults, we know that it was a terrible instrument of war and it was terrible to use it, whether we had any choice or not. How many of Edward Teller's "superbombs" do we and the rest of the world have in our arsenals now. It must be in the thousands, isn't it?Of course this is a topical biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer, not the story of the conception, building, and deployment of the first atomic bombs. If you want the context, an hour-long documentary is available free on YouTube: The Moment in Time: The Manhattan Project. It's interesting in its own right.This was one of the finest miniseries I've ever seen on television, and there wasn't a serial murderer in it, unless they were all serial murderers.
