Sienna-Rose Mclaughlin
The movie really just wants to entertain people.
Jenni Devyn
Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.
Billy Ollie
Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable
rdnhansen
An unnecessary remake? Not a chance! Finely crafted on every level, with a few directorial quirks, but that's Branagh. Wonderful to watch and listen to. Great script. Perfect pacing. Flawless acting. Priceless one-liners. Agatha Christie brought beautifully to the screen. And I even forgive the CGI. Sometimes the critics are right and sometimes the public is. In this case, the latter. The movie made $350 million and hinted at a remake of "Death on the Nile." Go, Kenneth!
tish247
Wow...kind of unusual that I would be so at odds with most of the reviews, here. But I LOVED this remake! I do have to admit...I wasn't the biggest fan of the 1974 version, so maybe that's why. And it's not that I just reject older Agatha Christie movies. I loved Death on the Nile (1978), and Evil Under the Sun (1982). But this remake was beautifully shot, well written, and DIDN'T move at a seemingly glacial pace, which is something that occasionally annoys me about a lot of early 70's films. I love film from every time period, but seriously...I think the popularity of quaaludes had an obviously quantifiable effect on the films of the 70's. Everything was soooooooo drawn out and kind of boring. And washed out, color-wise. Yes, yes, I know I'm going to catch a ton of s**t about this. Anyway, I thought the actors did a fine job, and I especially have to single out Branagh for his take on Hercule Poirot (and his directing!). I would never have believed anyone could replace Peter Ustinov in my heart as Poirot, but he made the character his own. He went with a more serious, more complex and tortured, more inward-looking Poirot, instead of the quippy, sassy, amused and amusing Poirot that Ustinov gave us...which is not to say Branagh's Poirot was humorless..."Forgive me, I am Belgian" had me laughing out loud. It was an interesting choice, and a smart one, in my humble opinion. I absolutely cannot wait to see him in Death on the Nile (if the hint of a sequel at the end of this film is portentous)!!!
MiketheWhistle
I've read the book and enjoyed the 1974 version multiple times, but this remake is simply horrible. Much was made of that 1974 mustache and this time they really try to make it into a spider - so in other words too much of it. Sometimes it's just that je ne sais quoi as to why it's worse, but this time it is as plain as the nose on your face. I could go on to give numerous failures, but just look at all the reviews that nail it.
dave-62508
It's visible, but the 1974 version with Sean Connery it's 10 times better and more accurate to the original book, I don't understand how they still hire Penelope Cruz, she is a disaster as an actress.
