Mr. Jones

2013 "If You See Him... Run"
4.6| 1h30m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 02 May 2013 Released
Producted By:
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Scott (Jon Foster) is a filmmaker in need of inspiration. He and his girlfriend Penny (Sarah Jones) move into a desolate house hoping to make a breakthrough. Then they discover their neighbor, the elusive Mr. Jones. Famous for his haunting sculptures, Mr. Jones has remained a mystery to the world. Scott and Penny, convinced that they have found the perfect film subject, sneak into his workshop and realize that their curiosity may have chilling consequences. Who is Mr. Jones?

Watch Online

Mr. Jones (2013) is now streaming with subscription on AMC+

Director

Karl Mueller

Production Companies

Mr. Jones Videos and Images
View All

Mr. Jones Audience Reviews

NipPierce Wow, this is a REALLY bad movie!
AniInterview Sorry, this movie sucks
SnoReptilePlenty Memorable, crazy movie
Melanie Bouvet The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.
begob A dreaming couple downsize to the woods, where they enter a nightmare.Huge amount of skill in the storytelling. The opening sequence has lovely dialogue between a couple travelling in a car (the out-of-range phone conundrum is dealt with in seconds), then the editing flicks brilliantly through the exposition.But this doesn't hit the bass note needed for horror. Or, as an earlier reviewer said, it doesn't click and it's hard to tell why. It feels like an exercise in horror, rather than a horror, and I really didn't react to any of the scenes with fear, although there was tension throughout. The writer/director probably prefers original drama, rather than genre - if not he should stick with advertising.It gets back to the problem of treating horror as metaphor. Horror has nothing to do with reality - it is a dreamworld where the bizarre is made literal. So in this case the stolen package has to be the core, has to be explained consistent with the dreamworld. Instead, it's treated as a symbol and we never find out what's inside. This is genre - it's that simple. David Lynch is an exception.So much to admire about this: writing, directing, editing, sound. And the actors were good. But not a good horror.
kosmasp Found footage with a twist? How many times have heard this one? Too many times to count. And not only was I skeptical, the movie kind of showed me that it was as I expected (which means not very good). But if you can stay with it through the end, you might get something of a "reward". By that I mean the really wicked ending, that is kind of psychedelic, even without the use of any enhancing drugs.The effect is built up during the movie, which takes it sweet old time. Something that is sort of boring. Plus the characters are not really helping, doing what other horror movie stock characters do: wrong decisions, even when faced with consequences. But again, the ending almost makes up for that, if you like weird.
TheRedDeath30 A young man convinces his wife to give up everything so that they can move to a shack in the middle of nowhere that will enable him to film the best nature documentary ever. They discover that their neighbor may be an enigmatic artist named Mr. Jones who creates creepy scarecrows. As they dive deeper into the mystery than they should, they discover that Mr. Jones may be creating totems to protect them from the dream world and they may have just ruined that protection and unleashed nightmare forces upon them.What a great concept, right? I was drawn into what could have been a great movie, but ultimately doesn't have the creative forces behind it to bring that idea to any sort of reasonable fruition. It does start off pretty good. The acting from the only two real characters in the movie is pretty good for a low budget horror film, though we are not really given any background or development that truly makes us learn anything about these people so that we'll care about them down the road. They are just an anonymous couple who seem to have given up life to be artists. They discover Mr. Jones cabin fairly early on in the film and there's some promise there as the scarecrows are pretty effectively made and lend some atmosphere to things, though let's not pretend these are original in any way. They're essentially more twisted versions of the policeman scarecrow in CHILDREN OF THE CORN.The first big problem in the movie is the found footage style. I'm not a hate of found footage, like so many others seem to be and I do not think it makes a movie garbage right off the bat, but you have to be using it for a reason, and you have to be consistent with it to give it the right feel. There's no reason for this to exist as found footage. Nothing is gained by the pretense of this being filmed by the characters, rather than just admitting it's a movie. Worse, it's really inconsistently shot. There are voice-overs, text overlays to introduce characters in interviews and shots that just plain could not have been created by the characters' filming at all. It breaks up the illusion of "found footage" even more and destroys it pretty much. They would have been much better off just telling this as a straightforward narrative.The biggest problems with the movie come once things start getting strange. Basically, things are just getting strange for the sake of being strange featuring a lot of random imagery and sounds, quick cuts from shot to shot and scene to scene and nonsense storytelling. It quickly becomes very hard to tell what's going on, or for that matter to even see what's going on in a lot of shots. It's all done under the pretense of being "dreamlike", but the reality is that it's a convenient excuse to not have to actually tell much of a story, to not have to create an actual narrative that makes sense, to not have to back up your plot with any events that would support what happens. You can just fill your fun time with anything you want to and say "it's a dream". A 4-year old's scribbling may be images in their mind, but few of us know what the picture is supposed to be and that's basically what this movie is.It all leads to a climax that I'm sure the director thinks is very clever and people who want to feel artsy will tell you has some grand meaning to be discussed in length. It means nothing because nothing that happened in the movie proceeding it has any real value. Random images leading to a random conclusion. That is all.
Helena Rix Warming This movie is really thought through and the details are to perfection! - but you have to get it just right, and I think I did. Its all filmed by handhold camera and they did a great job! In the beginning we meet Scott and Penny, a happy young couple there just sold their apartment and moved away from family and friends, because Scott wanted to make a documentary about nature. They gambled it all and moved into a forest far away from civilization. Scotts interest is lost fast and this create troubles in their relationship.One day they run into Mr. Jones, a gateway keeper who keeps nightmares out of our world. He do this with these creepy "totems", he places around the woods, they make some sort of force. They will now make a movie about Mr. Jones and his art, because he is known as a mysterious artist and such a movie could bring in a load of money! .... Scott and Penny disturbs Mr. Jones force and now they will fight the consequences.You have to listen carefully when you see the interviews Scott do. This movie is a masterpiece and the "totems" are beautiful!