Stoutor
It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.
Nicole
I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.
Billy Ollie
Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable
rpolowin
This missive is scientifically naive and is guilty of "cherry picking" statistics to support their case. The WHO data is misused citing Class 2B possible (0-100%) (with >250 other environmental risks) as opposed to probable 2A (50-100%) carcinogenic risk. The film confuses epidemiological data with that of experiment, and equivocates them. Anecdotal evidence is used to support their case but shows no causal nexus. The film and its proponents have an agenda that is very unclear about the actual radiation-physics issues, and banter scientific jargon to credit and authenticate their case. This film is a real disappointment and disservice to the integrity of the scientific exploration of this issue.
