Tuchergson
Truly the worst movie I've ever seen in a theater
Bob
This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.
Darin
One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.
Cheryl
A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.
csteidler
It's a foggy night. A man with an umbrella enters a London shop. Loud threats are heard and the shopkeeper disappears. A note is found that reads PAY OR BE SEEN NO MORE. The plot is forgettable but this sleek mystery-comedy from MGM is about as smooth as 1930s B movies get. Reporter George Murphy sticks his nose into the missing person case and tangles with Scotland Yard man George Zucco and rich girl Rita Johnson. Everything happens very quickly: Murphy sees a man with an umbrella climbing in a window, so he follows him in and tackles him in the hall. Turns out the intruder is Rita Johnson's butler and next thing you know Murphy and Johnson are exchanging silly dialog:Johnson: "Frankly, I'm disappointed in you, Mr. Dennis. You've been on this case almost two hours, and what have you done besides attacking my poor butler?" Murphy: "I've met you."George Zucco is fun to watch as a detective instead of the villain for once; he and Murphy enjoy the typical friendly inspector-reporter rivalry. Virginia Field has a colorful role as a barmaid. Leo G. Carroll as the butler is also worth keeping an eye on. There's a bit of suspense but nothing too intense--and certainly more comedy than mystery. Unpretentious fun.
LeonLouisRicci
Nothing in this MGM B-Movie Works. The Mystery is Blown in the First Five Minutes with Some Very Bad Make-Up and the Bad Make-Up is Used for Two Other Characters Before this Really Bad Movie Concludes.The Acting is Atrocious by All Except the Dog and Even He Cannot Match His Prototype from The Thin Man Series. Everything Here is Overcooked and Insufferable. The Characters are Stereotypical to the Extreme and the Film, Shot on the Back-Lot, Looks Confined, Stagy, and Hardly Atmospheric.George Murphy is a Hammy Bore, the Bar-Maid Will Have You Rolling Your Eyes or Running Out of the Room, and the Usually Reliable George Zucco and Leo G. Carroll are Trying Hard to Make Things Interesting but to No Avail. It's Perhaps One of the Worst Movies Ever Made with the MGM Logo.
RRPilot
Here is a film that brought waves of nostalgia to an old movie buff who usually never forgets a film but often cannot remember the titles of something I have not seen in 50 years. I viewed it by chance on TCM and as soon as I saw the Umbrella Man I knew it was an old favorite from childhood. I am constantly drawn to any film about London and this was no exception. It contains much of the usual elements of period London, the constant fog, Big Ben, elegant town house, eerie Thames River, bumbling police, pub, two lovely ladies and a semi-comical newspaper man protagonist. However it was the bone-chilling Umbrella Man that made the indelible imprint on my young mind years ago. Now the film seems silly and outdated and not the least bit scary, oh but what fun to see again. The film contained credible performances with a somewhat predictable plot. With a little bit of rewriting and a skilled director I think this film would be a great candidate for a serious remake.
Hitchcoc
There's not much to this. A reporter is detained from a trip to Paris due to a series of murders he initially has not interest in. He gets hooked up with a rich girl who likes adventure and this almost gets her killed. The murderer runs around with an umbrella which identifies him but also keeps him from being apprehended (it is foggy, after all, and everyone seems to have the same umbrella). There are some pretty good performances by Leo G. Carroll and George Zucco. George Murphy pulls things off pretty well, but the whole plot is too transparent. There is also an interesting romantic development between the two leads. The ending leaves a bit to be desired, but it does have some plausibility. Nevertheless, the film is interesting, atmospheric in places, but pretty unremarkable.