GamerTab That was an excellent one.

Skunkyrate Gripping story with well-crafted characters

SparkMore n my opinion it was a great movie with some interesting elements, even though having some plot holes and the ending probably was just too messy and crammed together, but still fun to watch and not your casual movie that is similar to all other ones.

TaryBiggBall It was OK. I don't see why everyone loves it so much. It wasn't very smart or deep or well-directed.

writers_reign With hindsight there's a wonderful irony at work here; screenwriter Curt Siodmak (kid brother of director Robert) was born in Dresden, Germany, and turned out this screenplay about the nightly bombings in London a good two years before Bomber Harris orchestrated the almost total annihilation of Dresden (which had no military value) by carpet bombing. Siodmak had made his name writing a different kind of horror with titles like Wolf Man, I Walked With A Zombie and the like and managed to pull off this neat 'why' not so much as 'who' dunnit featuring John Abbot as the cool assassin and Lloyd Corrigan - so memorable in the Jose Ferrer Cyrano de Bergerac and later The Manchurian Candidate - as the intrepid detective who solves the case. At 50-odd minutes it's a nice little curio.

dbborroughs Moody murder mystery set during the early days of the Blitz. As people huddle in bomb shelters someone is going around killing well placed people. Who is doing it and why? Could it be the kindly tobacco salesman? Off beat film has mood and an odd plot that keeps you watching but there is something off about it that makes it more an intellectual candy than an emotional one. I like the film but I don't love it, part of the problem is the film is talky and oddly paced. The things that make it intellectually intriguing are the same things that make it prickly.If you want a mystery that doesn't feel like any other this is it. If you want one that is warm and snuggly this isn't it.definitely worth seeing for the intellectual intriguing nature of it.

Michael_Elliott London Blackout Murders (1943) * 1/2 (out of 4) Bland, boring and rather predictable "mystery" from Republic set during London as WWII is at full steam. The people are terrified about the bombs dropping from the air but they've also got to worry about murders happening in the streets by a nut with a hypodermic needle. It turns out the killer is a store owner (John Abbott) who is considered one of the nicest men around so it's not who is doing the crimes but why. When you watch a Republic film you know very well not to expect anything overly special. At best you hope for a slightly entertaining film but sadly that's not the case with this thing, which even at 55-minutes seems way too long and pointless. The film tries to be clever and there are a few nice touches but in the end there's just not enough going on with this thing to make it worth viewing. Some of the interesting aspects is having it set during the war with the people of London having to deal with the air raids. This also leads to a couple nice scenes showing the women in the factories working while the men are off fighting in the war. This was something that was happening and it's rather shocking that so few movies mention it. We even get some talk of Jack the Ripper but outside of this stuff London BLACKOUT MURDERS is very flat. The entire reasons as to why this nice man is killing people should be obvious within the first few minutes of the film so when the big twist happens it comes way too late. Abbott is a fine actor and does what he can with the role but even he can't work miracles. Mary McLeod plays the woman renting a room from him but she can't add much either. The final courtroom stuff is rather embarrassing so needless to say there's not really any reason to check this one out. Universal horror vet Curt Siodmak wrote the screenplay.

the_mysteriousx 'London Blackout Murders' is a 50 minute suspense B-picture from early 1943 about the then-current war in London. I'm always amazed at how Hollywood would make so many films in the early 40s about the war, whereas today it took them until 2006 to release anything on the Afghan and Iraq wars. This film definitely embodies the one-for-all and all-for-one spirit that films of this era did, but in this quick running time, there isn't much time for anything.The story involves a man (John Abbott - an excellent actor) who is murdering select individuals during the German bombings of London. He uses a hypodermic needle that is embedded in his pipe. So, the film is not about who, but why. We follow a young lady (Mary McLeod) who, after her parents are killed in bombings, is boarding in his building. She sees the needle in the pipe and is suspicious of him as newspapers say the killer used such a needle. Upon his second murder, Abbott is witnessed by a police officer (Lloyd Corrigan) who looks into his character further.This is somewhat reminiscent of what Hitchcock was doing around this time - 'Suspicion' and 'Foreign Correspondent'. It is interesting and neatly directed by the journeyman George Sherman. One only wishes it were longer. By the 40 minute mark we are in the final lap and are about to find out the why. I understand there seems to be a 59 minute version that originally came out, but I would think that would be hard to ever see again. Paramount owns these old Republic films and seem pretty stingy on releasing them. You can only find them through collectors.That all being said, 'London Blackout Murders' is recommended to suspense fans (there are absolutely no horror moments despite what you may have read elsewhere), and fans of the WWII era.