Little Shots of Happiness

1997
4.4| 1h23m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 14 February 1997 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://bangorfilms.com/wordpress/?page_id=107
Info

An urban comedy of identity lost and found via sexual indiscretions, Frances is initially a bored 9-to-5-er. She comes to the much-prolonged decision to leave her mentally unstable husband and begins to live out of her office, unbeknownst to her co-workers. Each night she goes to a different nightclub or a bar in Boston and forces herself out of her protected prim existence by meeting and picking up different men. Through exploring different persona's and what she is capable of, she hopes to find herself.

Genre

Comedy

Watch Online

Little Shots of Happiness (1997) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Todd Verow

Production Companies

Little Shots of Happiness Videos and Images

Little Shots of Happiness Audience Reviews

GazerRise Fantastic!
CommentsXp Best movie ever!
Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!
Abegail Noëlle While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.
Nikolaus Maack It's a shallow movie pretending to be deep. And it looks like it was filmed with a toy movie camera held by an epileptic, featuring a non-stop soundtrack of repetitive sound mixed with broken bits of punk songs. The dialogue was recorded underwater, that's the only thing that can explain how bad the sound is. The film is stuffed with bad acting and improvised scenes that go on endlessly. All of this could possibly be forgiven -- it's a low budget picture -- but this film is awful. There's just nothing there of any interest. Well, that's not entirely true. There are glimmers of promise, and a weak storyline of interest, but it all flops around aimlessly, like the movie has been stabbed in the legs.The film features dialogue like the following:"Can I have a cigarette?" "How'd you know I was a smoker?" "I had a feeling." "Smoking's bad for you." "So what?" Snarky, surprised, "So what?!"And the characters spar and fuss and half-play, without ever actually saying anything. I believe the example I've provided is supposed to be strangers flirting. That should give you an idea of what you're in for.I suspect it was all done to feel realistic -- the jerky camera, the bad dialogue, the improvised scenes, the bad sound. It's all so jarring that the movie is almost unwatchable. (And I normally don't mind "cinema verite" camera work.) Worst of all, nothing really happens. Characters come and go. The plot spins its wheels and just peters out into nothing.The ending (which I will not mention) sums up the cold, callous, disinterested feeling of the entire film. It's flat, almost utterly emotionless. I suspect the end is supposed to be funny in that "ironic" way. It isn't. It's just the dull little cherry on top of the dull little sundae.Watch for the paintings on the wall in a few scenes -- I suspect the director had a painter friend he wanted to promote. The paintings are sort of interesting, but unfortunately the camera doesn't stay still long enough to get a good look at them.This movie has won awards, supposedly. That baffles me.
Celebriande Bonnie Dickenson and Todd Verow team up to give a very real feeling look at someone who just jumps off her life and hits the road running. Shot in digital video and in that style that was groundbreaking for Verow in the nineties, this is a 'you are there' kind of feeling to this that really makes you care about the characters. This is a special little film, worth looking for.