Matrixston Wow! Such a good movie.

Phonearl Good start, but then it gets ruined

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Kayden This is a dark and sometimes deeply uncomfortable drama

Kátia Morais That's all. Could have been a seemingly decent film if it lasted for no more that 40 minutes and then we all would go about our business. The movie is so long with so little on hand, that it just becomes ridiculous. And that awful, awfully long rape scene... Disgusting! It was hard to watch until the end.

BA_Harrison When will American backpackers learn that foreigners simply cannot be trusted, with Eastern Europeans being the most devious and dangerous of all. It doesn't get any more Eastern European than Georgia, where Landmine Goes Click takes place; it is there that soon-to-be married couple Alicia (Spencer Locke) and Daniel (Dean Geyer) and best-man Chris (Sterling Knight) go hiking, blissfully oblivious to the horrors that await them.When Georgian local Devi (Giorgi Tsaava) takes a group photo of the young travellers, he positions his subjects so that Chris's foot activates a landmine. Unable to move for fear of blowing himself to bits, Chris is forced to stand in the same spot while Devi goes for help, leaving Daniel and Alicia to try and calm their friend. Except that Daniel really doesn't care: having discovered that Chris has slept with Alicia, he has deliberately orchestrated this terrifying situation, with the help of Devi, as a form of punishment. So far, so contrived.After revealing to Chris and Alicia that he is aware of their dalliance, Daniel offers Alicia a shovel to dig a trench for Chris to dive into should he try to leap to safety; he then leaves the pair to their fate. While Alicia is digging, another local, Ilya (Kote Tolordava), passes by and, being Eastern European, takes advantage of the unfortunate travellers' predicament, playing mind games with them, humiliating them, and eventually raping Alicia while all Chris can do is look on helplessly. They're not having a good day.Through reasons that I won't go into (mostly because I can't remember), Chris is able to leap to safety without losing any limbs, but Alicia sustains fatal injuries. Meanwhile, Ilya makes his escape. The scene is now set for some serious revenge, Chris tracking down Ilya to his family home, and getting even.Landmine Goes Click could have been a very satisfying rape/revenge movie, but director Levan Bakhia really drags out the middle section—Ilya's humiliation of Alicia—and ultimately suggests that revenge isn't as sweet as the old saying says it is, with Chris looking less than pleased with his payback. I don't know about you, but that isn't what I want from a revenge movie: where's the fun if the vigilante isn't happy about his hard work?

abogges I get what they're going for here. I'm a horror nut and this premise was too juicy to pass up when scanning through my streaming apps. I'm on board with the shock-value horror aesthetic, I've seen Human Centipede a dozen times and I admired what Last House on the Left was trying to do. Landmine Goes Click is a great premise wrapped in extremely questionable filmmaking choices. It starts out like an okay Twilight Zone (or Saw, for that matter) story. Lots of people here are pointing out the problems with the brutalization of women (which I'll get to), but I understand where the filmmakers are coming from. They're not saying that the characters were right in brutalizing the only female characters. They were trying to show that our protagonist's troubles earlier in the film turned him into just as much of a monster as our original antagonist. In seeking revenge, the hero became a much worse villain than the villain ever was. If that was the point, then I get it and it's even a good idea (even if overused) for a revenge movie. The problem I have with the execution is that we never feel sorry for the women. **SPOILERS** We feel terrible for Chris because he's unable to save Alicia. Sure, we feel bad for her too but we're focused on Chris and how he had to endure watching her get raped and carrying her body and listening to her die. We are supposed to see that the antagonist is suffering because he has to watch his daughter get abused. I'm really, really not the person who points to every movie and asks why the female characters are just used as props, but this movie broke me in that respect. There are 3 women in the film and every single one is used as a device and torture target to inflict emotional pain on a male character. I said that the filmmakers made questionable choices. One of these was using rape as a plot device to show the audience how tough Chris' trouble was. Of course we're supposed to feel Alicia's pain, too, but only insofar as it makes us reflect on what we would do if we were in Chris' shoes. In the same way, I found myself kind of rooting for Chris to brutalize the family at the end, and I choose to blame that on the filmmakers rather than my own sick desires for revenge. I'll also say that a 3-minute rape sequence filled with vivid sounds that does not cut away and zooms in to make sure we can see just how much Alicia is in pain and makes sure we can see she's crying real tears, is a little much for me. Most people don't recognize gunshots in a real-world shooting scenario because Hollywood has tricked us into thinking they sound louder and fuller than they actually do. This rape scene was like filming a gunfight with no quick-cuts, no embellished gunshot sounds, no overuse of blood. It's too real to feel any normal cinematic escapism. Instead, I feel like I'm watching a real person get raped. I did not enjoy that. I didn't necessarily enjoy watching what's her face get killed in Scream either, but it was done with purposeful cinematic staging so it was entertaining. I liked watching Scream much more than I would like watching a snuff film where real people get slashed to death. That was my problem with this rape scene. **/SPOILERS**I can enjoy shocking horror, gore, and brutality. I can overlook and understand movies that don't have great cinematography or dialog. What I take exception with in this movie was that it tried way too hard to get the audience to understand the real-world emotional pain of the characters in a not- at-all escapist way. The Human Centipede (not a film to hold as a measure of all cinema, I know) was shocking but over the top in a way that disconnected us from the characters emotionally. Sure, we still felt for the characters. Same with Last House on the Left, we still came away with an ache in our stomachs, but the impact was dampened because of the use of devices that disconnect us from what was on the screen. Landmine Goes Click gets too real, too quickly, and in all the wrong ways. I don't need to watch movies that shock me in ways that evoke real feelings of disgust at actual horrors in the real world. Are there serial killers and chainsaw-wielding psychos in the world? Sure. But Friday 13th and Scream have a level of disbelief built into them that this movie lacks. Serial killers are like the boogie man, so making them the baddies of movies is like fantasy. Making an alcoholic rapist the bad guy is like making a movie about Ebola where we spend 2 hours watching an 8 year old girl slowly die of diarrhea. It's far too real to be entertainment. If I want to watch a vivid depiction of the types of brutality that dirty old men can inflict on young, pretty girls, I'll watch the news. Instead, I wanted to watch some escapism horror that let's me satisfy the sick parts of my brain with blood and terror and, sure, even brutal violence against women if the script calls for it, and all the other things that skilled writers and directors know how to put on screen without giving their audience anxiety over how easily men have preyed on women since the dawn of time. It's like they wanted to make a powerful movie about the horrors of forgotten buried explosives (it's a real problem- children get blown up all of the time), a snuff film about brutal manipulation and rape, and a horror/suspense revenge flick. Instead the filmmakers just sewed all three together so that they share one digestive tract. The end result was the same: crap from beginning to end.

The Couchpotatoes This is one of those movies where I constantly had mixed feelings about it. Sometimes I thought the movie wasn't going anywhere, plus that the acting is not the greatest but at the end I thought it wasn't a bad movie at all. There were some scenes that were hard to watch. Scenes where I wanted to jump out of my couch and beat the crap out of some characters but when I think about it, it is a good thing that I felt like that because it means that the story got to me. At one point I thought it was never going to end and one character in particular was really annoying me. It's a low budget movie, with no outstanding actors, but the story all fits together at the end. It's about revenge and it gets emotional. Moral of the story, don't do to others what you don't want to be done to you.