Inconceivable

2017
5.2| 1h45m| R| en| More Info
Released: 30 June 2017 Released
Producted By: EFO Films
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A mother looks to escape her abusive past by moving to a new town where she befriends another mother, who grows suspicious of her.

Genre

Drama, Thriller, Crime

Watch Online

Inconceivable (2017) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Jonathan Baker

Production Companies

EFO Films

Inconceivable Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Inconceivable Audience Reviews

More Review
Fluentiama Perfect cast and a good story
Spidersecu Don't Believe the Hype
Ogosmith Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.
Brendon Jones It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.
James When you've seen the title of this 2017 film from Jonathan Baker you may already have seen the cleverest thing about it. "Inconceivable" resembles the 2014 "Left Behind" in being a Nick (Cage) and Nicky (Whelan) show. While "Inconceivable" is certainly a better thriller than "Left Behind" it sees Cage in the role of medico "Brian" rather coasting along, not really having too many lines, and in fact looking more than a little marginalised by 5 females, of which two are young daughters and 3 are adult women who are in various ways (!) their mothers and carers. (Obviously one of them is Angela, Brian's wife, played by Gina Gershon).Given that the three female leads are played by the aforesaid Whelan (who steals the show) and Gershon, as well as Natalie Eva Marie; given that these three bond very closely from the outset (inter alia in a home kept by Brian and his wife that is far more palatial than Buckingham Palace!); given that the 3 range from the good-looking to the downright hot; and given that all three are seen in various states of undress, one would be forgiven for thinking that the makers are leading us in various more or less titillating directions. This is mistake number 1 to make if you're an audience member (male especially), but it's also mistake number 1 from the makers, since the sewer-like mind of the more-experienced filmgoer is likely to be developing rather lustier and more far-reaching plots than this film is ultimately willing and prepared to deliver!How can it not disppoint, in those circumstances? Indeed, when "Inconceivable" stops toying or messing about with us and homes in on what it's actually trying to put across, it transpires that this is mainly a warning against various forms of surrogate motherhood! This is a bit wrong (conceivably even cruel) of the makers, and the strategy at the same time alienates the piece from quite a chunk of its potential audience. Since the film also has upsetting miscarriage issues to deal with, that's a number more who should NOT be watching this film - really! So somehow this is all a bit exploitative, and all the more so as Whelan's portrayal is very sexy but also intended to convey creepy singlemindedness and in fact insane murderousness; and it seems for much of the movie that, having had a tough time before, she is now going to get absolutely everything she wants... and apparently with no police force or FBI out there at all to stop her!!!!! That this is not so is due to a twist in the tale which comes as a bit of a surprise (good), but only because it's eccentrically disconnected with what has gone before (bad). A further example of this kind of "throwaway" or "expendable" content relates to the strand in the film that brings in great actress Faye Dunaway. The years have moved on now to the point where Dunaway can be portrayed as an adult character's mother - in fact that of the Cage's Brian - but her role as prophet of doom suddenly goes into reverse towards the end of the film, and in fact needs to do so as all her warnings come so fully true that her contribution would otherwise look entirely surplus to requirements. Either way, that's a pity!All in all, "Inconceivable" is an indecisive film that has a touch of atmosphere and a measure of watchability about it; but since so much of that is dependent on the Whelan character and its interactions with others, the doting portrayal of her extreme good looks gets rather heavily in the way of any message the film is trying to convey. And since that message is anyway a dubious (even a salaciously harmful and divisive) one, there's a big question mark over several aspects of this thriller. The default position of the old-fashioned, closed-minded, non-desperate, readily child-producing person out there is that surrogacy is kind of weird and wrong and bound to be complicated; and in fact this is the easiest position in the world to take up. Not requiring much effort at all from those in the luxury position of never having to contemplate it. But all other things are not equal, and some people make use of surrogacy as a chance for happiness, to fill a vast void in their lives. While it has to be admitted that things can potentially go wrong with that, why should a film put together such a scare story that will be mainly neutral for most viewers, but particularly hurtful for a small group?
Brigid O Sullivan (wisewebwoman) But you couldn't pay me enough to watch this film to the bitter end. And yeah, bitter is the word I would use as a descriptor. Everything, sets, cast, script has an edge of bitterness as in look at us so swanky rich, or look at us pretend we're enjoying these rug rats or look at straight out of central casting snarky mother in law .Basically the plot you've seen done better in other films of this ilk of evil woman killer and nice unsuspecting eventually gobsmacked family who survive, at an immediate gallop, knife wounds and messy caesarians. This one is dressed up in an unbelievable multipel million dollars mansion, pool, all funded by one working doctor and the other one a nervous wreck with a plastic immobile face.Nicolas Cage has moved far beyond his sell by date, he sleepwalks his way through this with a mouth full of marbled dialogue of some kind never sounding like any kind of doctor I've ever encountered. Anywhere.I frankl didn't care what happened to the whole sodden bitter mess.1 out of 10.
thomasthomaslai The movie is so so but . This is pretty out of blue. I thought John Travolta was gonna pop out or something.
berfinserenatsimser I rarely write reviews but I feel obligated to give one because it was the reviews that I gave this movie a chance.First of all, what twist? The plot was so obvious and predictable. I was not surprised whatsoever at any point of the movie. Second, the story was not realistic in my opinion. The characters behave in a stupid way most of the time which made it hard for me to associate with any of them. The husband is way too unsupportive and still portrayed to be a good one at the end. So, in short, if you enjoy only very well written and directed, realistic movies with real twists, stay away from this one!