Hulk

2003 "What if everything you were forced to keep inside was suddenly set free?"
5.6| 2h18m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 20 June 2003 Released
Producted By: Universal Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Bruce Banner, a genetics researcher with a tragic past, suffers massive radiation exposure in his laboratory that causes him to transform into a raging green monster when he gets angry.

Watch Online

Hulk (2003) is now streaming with subscription on Starz

Director

Production Companies

Universal Pictures

Hulk Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Hulk Audience Reviews

More Review
Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good
ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.
Stephan Hammond It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,
Payno I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.
js34888120 Just rewatched this movie after watching it many moons ago in the hope that, after the passage of time, I would enjoy it more. WRONG!It's just a jibberish movie with a terrible storyline that it's virtually impossible to keep up with ... and the end - what the hell happened to his dad???? Unless I google it I haven't a clue! And that is why I gave this movie 1/10 score!
invisibleunicornninja The 2008 version may have an actual plot, but at least this version isn't boring. The Hulk in this movie has a presence, and the look of the movie is interesting. When this movie is bad, its funny. Being so funny its bad is better than being mindblowingly boring like the 2008 version. I would only recommend this movie if you like laughing at incompetent scrips, or if you're a fan of The Hulk.
speedcanary This is the best Hulk movie of them all. Bana is fantastic as scientist turned green bulky anger machine. The whole cast is great, as is the writing and effects. This shows the human side of Hulk better than the newer avenger movies.
rat_202 This movie proved to be VERY divisive upon release. We heard the now familiar rumblings of 'superhero fatigue,' and talk that the comic book bubble was about to burst - and this was fourteen years ago!Let's be fair - Hulk is not a bad movie. Ang Lee doesn't know how to make a bad movie. Having said that, was he the right guy for this movie? Hmmm... The story comes across more as an art-house type Greek tragedy than a superhero flick, when people really just want to see The Hulk and The Abomination pummelling each other. They did so in the Incredible Hulk, a lame reboot nobody went to see. The action beats, when they do eventually come, are pretty impressive. We see Big Green taking on tanks, helicopters and, er, poodles. The Hulk himself looks really weird now. People were criticising the CGI even then, and of course, time has not improved it. It would be a while before they would get the Hulk right. One thing that I hadn't seen before was the framing of some shots in the style of comic book panels, a technique later borrowed by other comic-book movies (see Kick-Ass). Eventually Marvel realised that The Hulk works better as a supporting character than as a lead, but Hulk remains and underrated curio.