BroadcastChic Excellent, a Must See

Freaktana A Major Disappointment

ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

mraculeated The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.

jfawell Not as bad as some here say. A tremendous showcase for Edward Everett Horton. His talking/singing duets with Ross Alexander are marvels of comic timing. Horton was in many better films than this, but few that showcased his talent as vividly. Ross Alexander has several scenes where he carries himself with great poise and comic sophistication. There is evidence here he could have been a stylish leading man had he not killed himself. Little known June Martel is surprisingly fetching as diner waitress, though she fades a little when masquerading as a debutant. The story construction is awful in this film but there is some snappy dialogue. In the end a must-see for Horton's and Alexander's musical numbers.

John Seal The other reviews for Going Highbrow tend to be a little harsh, I think, so even though I've only given it a '5', I'm going to concentrate on the film's better qualities. Guy Kibbee and ZaSu Pitts are marvelous as a nouveau riche Kansas couple trying to impress Manhattan's bluebloods. Accordingly, they've purchased a pricey painting in Europe, attracting the attention of hustler Augie (the always wonderful Edward Everett Horton), who thinks he can squeeze some of their money out of them by selling them some artwork owned by the mother of his friend Harley (Ross Alexander, who should have been a star). Romantic interest is provided by waitress Sandy (gorgeous June Martel), and Judy Canova supplies yucks as her co-worker Annie. Sy Bartlett and Edward Kaufman's screenplay is filled with snappy dialogue, and as ridiculous as it all is, the result is tremendously entertaining.

MartinHafer This film is a wonderful example of a rotten plot yet wonderful characters. It appeared as if the film were actually written by two people--one for the plot and one who strictly designed the characters and wrote the dialog. As for the plot itself, it's easy to sum up with one word--"stupid". Instead of trying to describe it, just let it go with that! But as for the characters, I have always been a sucker for colorful character actors and this one has Edward Everett Horton, Guy Kibbee and Zasu Pitts (in a rather restrained performance, thank goodness). And the writers infused these characters with wonderful personalities that were very much in line with their normal screen personas. Kibbee was a not overly bright but decent "normal guy", Zasu played a bumpkin of sorts who wanted "class" and Horton played a rich but decent schemer. Together, they helped to infuse the film with enough warmth and humanity that I was able to overlook the films MANY deficiencies and just enjoy it. While this is certainly NOT a film you should rush to see, it's a very amiable time-passer and a good example of a quality B-movie.

malcolmgsw I was really full of anticipation before i viewed this film.What a great cast,full of great comedy actors from the 30s.I was about to uncover a forgotten masterpiece.How wrong i was.This was an extremely lame comedy,of the sort spawned by production requirements that one film a week be shipped out to the theatres.It just goes to show that you can have great talents but if you do not have a good script there is no likelihood that you will have a good film.Guy Kibee as usual plays a business man flirting with a younger woman,Zasu Pitts as so often plays the fretful wife and Edward Everett Horton plays Edward Everett Horton.Ross Alexander sings,if that is his own voice,a rather pleasant song.So the best that you can say about this film is that at 66 minutes it doesn't linger around too long.