Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Ogosmith Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Lachlan Coulson This is a gorgeous movie made by a gorgeous spirit.

jaxenross I never expected to watch the whole movie in its entirety. Carey isn't that bad in this movie as considered by many critics for her acting to be amateur; I think opposite of what critics say. The soundtrack is top-notch and I thought that the movie was powering. If you're a true fan of Carey, I truly would recommend this movie - even if it doesn't meet up all expectations. The only problem with this movie and the reason as to why it failed was releasing it after the 9/11 attacks happened (the Twin Towers make an appearance in this movie); they should've stuck with the original release date and the movie could've been a hit.All-in-all, not bad.

Dave from Ottawa Some bad movies, such as Showgirls or Mommie Dearest, become camp classics over time as people come to forgive their shortcomings, and just groove on their excesses. That a movie as famously bad as Glitter has not entered this realm of camp, even after fifteen years, is telling. It tells us that Glitter commits a higher sin than being bad. It is boring. And derivative. And staggeringly incompetent. It was assembled by c-list writers and a TV director, none of whom had much idea how to gain a viewer's attention, and less idea how to hold it. Scene composition is flat and dull, evoking memories of bad holiday TV movies, while failing to establish intimacy with the characters or goings on, even in close up. Early scenes feature a hazy or gauzy look, no doubt to recall Hollywood's golden age, but that simply succeeds in making the movie look trite and derivative, rather than classic. It also makes it look as if the set decorator forgot to dust. The club scenes feature a color palette straight out of Blade Runner, just not as cheery. Every creative element in Glitter has the look of something borrowed from another (better) movie. And the less said about the bizarre, almost random editing choices the better. Every scene transition is another wtf moment. Story and script construction are uniformly terrible. Scenes begin, stuff happens, scenes end... and NOTHING carries over. There is no continuing thread here of any kind - no overall character arc, no central theme, no ongoing visual motifs outside of the movie's hilariously inaccurate 80's fashion sense. Everything that happens seems utterly pointless, just a string of clichés recycled from old movies in which the chorus girl gets her big break. Glitter's brain-dead script gives none of its performers, not even once by accident, anything original or clever to say, nor any awareness of the storyline's utter inanity, making it increasingly difficult for the viewer to connect with the drama. And then we come to the Razzie-winning central 'performance'. La Carey could have been replaced by a Miss Piggy doll and the central role would have had more animation. Mariah's singular expression of vague incomprehension never changes, not even when gangster Terrence Howard grabs her face! To be fair she is not Glitter's only zombie marionette. Outside of Ann Magnusson's over-the-top pr woman, no actor in Glitter's 100 minute running time seems committed to being in any way memorable. A cynical person might suggest that they did this so that they could keep Glitter off their resumes without fear of contradiction. The result is a movie that defies any viewer to keep paying attention to it. You find yourself wanting to make a salad or do your taxes while the movie is playing, anything so that the time spent watching it is not a total waste. This brings us to the music. Hollywood seems to have forgotten that the most important element in any musical is music, despite the fact that the word is right there in the name of the genre. Grease turns into a pretty bad movie whenever the singing stops and The Bodyguard is only marginally better. Both were huge hits however, and the fact that their soundtracks went multi-platinum was not a coincidence. Purple Rain features some downright cringe inducing 'acting' by Prince and Appolonia, but redeems itself time and time again with great musical performances. Viewers will put up with so-so filler in a musical as long as the songs entertain and remain in the mind after the credits roll. Glitter, unfortunately, features Mariah's worst ever (and worst selling) album at its core. Not only are the musical sequences not entertaining on their own, but they also make it hard for the viewer to swallow the idea that fictional Mariah would become a superstar on the strength of them, since actual established star Mariah could not manage to peddle them in real life. Thus, the fictional Mariah fails to engage as a performer, the actual Mariah fails to cross over into Hollywood despite having great singing talent and only having to play a person with singing talent, and even the spectacle of these failures fails to entertain on the basic level of a train wreck. Glitter simply cannot provide an adequate reason to exist. Mariah's musical ability has already been showcased in a long succession of music videos, to better effect, and so we don't need Glitter for that. Rags to riches musical biographies have been done to death, so we hardly need another. The Girl in the Gold Boots told substantially the same story to drive-in goers fifty years ago! Heck, 42nd Street wore out this clichéd genre in 1933. If Glitter's only purpose was to act as a 100 minute commercial for its own soundtrack, as the Pokemon cartoons are simply ads for Pokemon toys, it fails there too, since it makes these crummy songs even less palatable in context than they would be standing on their own. So why does Glitter still exist? Was it financed by someone with a grudge against Mariah Carey, and she never caught on that she was being pranked until after its release? As a practical joke played on a gullible and vain pop diva, Glitter is pure malevolent genius. If, however, we were meant to have taken it seriously, then it's just a really, thoroughly worthless movie.Poll question: Which pop diva embarrassed herself worst? JLo in Gigli, Jessica in The Dukes of Hazzard, Britney in Crossroads, Clarkson in From Justin to Kelly or Mariah in this piece of drek? I vote Mariah in a close race.

Brandon Phillips Firstly, I don't know any other artist with the creative genius to record a soundtrack, write and sing most of the songs on it, come up with a movie idea, get the movie created, star in the movie, and still show face when the movie and soundtrack don't do well to support the nation through a tragedy.With that said, the movie wasn't bad if people tried to understand the concept and storyline. For what it was, the movie nailed every bit of what it was trying to convey. The reason the movie and soundtrack failed are due to the following:1. Jennifer Lopez and Tommy 2. Bad timing (synching up with 9/11) 3. Anti-Mariah initiatives at the turn of the centuryThis movie is a cult classic...maybe for all the wrong, unsubstantiated reasons....but a cult classic nonetheless.

evk311 great movie , i enjoyed it a lot. i was interested in the story how an artist becomes a superstar , and this movies shows it all . it is the perfect example as well , Mariah Carey and her life story. this is how it was in the days,and this movie shows it exactly how the life was in that time.it shows how the people were and how they lived. if the people or the artist seems fake in the movie , it probably has been done like that for a reason, people were fake in that time in that kind of club scene , and they actually still are. anybody that came up with a negative review here ,probably totally missed the point of this movie. it is not about how great the actors are and how great the cinematography is - actually at that point i thought that was great as well-but it is all about the story . it shows you where an unknown artist got recognized for talent and makes it up all the way to the top. very interesting to see , specially because we all know Mariah Carey. i understand people don't like her guts and quality , but let's be honest , she is an amazing artist like nobody else , she is famous and has millions of fans for a reason . she is beautiful and talented.this movie is not so much about Mariah herself , but more about the story in general of an artist who had the chance to climb up in the jungle that is called music business.if you are interested in such a story , than you will see a jewel of a movie here. but if you are more interested in Oscar winning material with amazing plot and special effects and amazing written stories , OK this is not the movie for you , and you probably will write a review this is the worst movie you ever saw, just like anybody else here. that is so unfair , glitter is a great movie for what it wants to show, very well done . and best of all : very realistic.i saw Oscar winning movies , and i thought they were complete boring . so it is all a matter of tasteglitter is a great movie in my opinion, i would recommend it to anyone because it shows the real life of how musicians live and their dreams to become recognized and how they reach the top with ups and downs.i think the movie was not accepted so well , because Mariah played herself , and people were expecting world wonders . but they got just plain reality to see . a true story. if somebody else would have played the main actress roll , it would have been maybe better for the movie . Mariah has such a strong personality , it overwhelms the whole picture, it was no problem for me . i was looking for the story anyway. but my point is , if another actress would have done this job , the movie could have been accepted much better and maybe get an Oscar. not that there is something wrong with Mariah as an actress, but the fact that she is playing actually herself might look a bit self crowning. maybe that is the reason why so much people disliked this movie . you are a great singer , and you play yourself in a movie to show how great you are. that was plus and plus and too much plus for yourself , and will end up in negative. if you are so cool and so great it just looks better if someone else will do that acting roll , instead of when you will do it yourself.that didn't matter for me , i loved the story . i will watch it again and enjoy sometime soon. if you love the 80s and the life around that time , this movie is a MUST SEE.