Huievest Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

Curapedi I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

AutCuddly Great movie! If you want to be entertained and have a few good laughs, see this movie. The music is also very good,

Neive Bellamy Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

chrismccloughen Filmed over four seasons at the Home of Compassion in Wellington, New Zealand, Gardening with Compassion, focuses on the life of ninety year old Sister Loyola Galvin, a nun in Mother Suzanne Aubert's Sister's of Compassion Roman Catholic religious order. Although having to get around on crutches or with cane at times, Sister Galvin enthusiastically tends to her gardening duties while extolling the importance of good compost and companion planting as she disperses pearls of wisdom and insights from her life. This is a simple but moving story of dedication and love from a woman who is both spiritual and practical, much as the founder of her order was. Technically, this is not the greatest cinematography that you will see, and I would have loved to have discovered more of Sister Loyola's interior spiritual life, but I respect her comment that such things can be difficult to put into words.

marklear-1 This film is a year in the life of an aging nun, and we learn much of her life story, her personal philosophy and much of it is put in context within her amazing love of gardening. She is an inspiration to many other folks, and is an engaging person to be with over the 100 minutes of this documentary. The film is divided into the four seasons of the gardens, and I felt that the order chosen was not random. The story is a gentle one, and the film moves along at a leisurely pace, appropriate for the nature of the material. There is one major criticism I had of the film - I found the cinematography very disappointing, and the hand-held work amongst the worst I have seen. (I think much of this was deliberate, but it did not work for me.) The corny use of soft focus, and the repetitive way it is done was also annoying. The director and producer really should have realized that this looked very amateurish, doing a disservice to the story.