Frailty

2002 "No Soul Is Safe."
7.2| 1h40m| R| en| More Info
Released: 12 April 2002 Released
Producted By: Cinerenta
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A mysterious man arrives at the offices of an FBI agent and recounts his childhood: how his religious fanatic father received visions telling him to kill people who were in fact "demons."

Genre

Drama, Thriller, Crime

Watch Online

Frailty (2002) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Bill Paxton

Production Companies

Cinerenta

Frailty Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Frailty Audience Reviews

Ehirerapp Waste of time
Stoutor It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.
Asad Almond A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.
Jakoba True to its essence, the characters remain on the same line and manage to entertain the viewer, each highlighting their own distinctive qualities or touches.
trishaade The movie FRAILTY concerns a father has a vision one night, sent to him by an angel, that he and his young sons have been chosen to kill demons who are hiding as humans. The movie opens with one of the sons, who states his name is Fenton, telling the F.B.I. agent who is handling the "God's Hands Killer" case that he knows who the murderer is. He is not believed initially, but by the end of the movie is able to prove to the agent that he does indeed know who is responsible. The film is generally done in a flashback style with most of the movie concerning Fenton's version of the family's history, how the killings began and continued and what happened when the father realized that Fenton wasn't buying into what his father and brother Adam were saying and doing. He is forced to minimally participate, but refuses to be involved in the actual killings and is subsequently punished by his father. Only when Fenton states he has received a vision as well is he considered to be safe by his father. He has come forward now because he doesn't want to carry around what he knows anymore. Other people have written about the last 1/4 of the film, so I won't spoil it here. Suffice it to say that the plot takes a lot of twists and turns towards the end and rather than taking place in flashback, is done in present day.Overall, I thought the movie was really well done with convincing performances by most of the cast. I do have to say I'm not a fan of Powers Boothe so it would be tough for me to write a fair review of how he did in the film - that being said, I liked the way he played his character the least.This film is not a horror movie in the true sense of the word. It is more of a crime thriller/drama as indicated in IMDb. It is suspenseful, however, and really works well in that regard. There are things that are very easy to miss at first watching. Keep your eyes and ears peeled. I don't want to mention them specifically, but in watching parts of the film a second time things become less muddy leading up to the movie's finish.The only thing I didn't like about FRAILTY was the very end - I had a lot of difficulty with what I felt the message of the movie was and what it appears to support. I won't say anything further than that other than the fact that I found it very disturbing, maybe as it was meant to be.Bottom line is that it is a good crime thriller and would be a good choice for fans of crime and suspense, however, be aware that the ending might be a little hard to swallow for some.
secondtake Frailty (2001)A psychological morie about a murderer that is so filled with clichés and idiocit plot contrivances (and terrible editing and direction), it's hard to watch. Bill Paxton is the lead psycho, and he's a cardboard idea of a psychotic killer. Stereotypes of evil and the craziness of religious extremists abound.Matthew McConaughey is young here, and good in a serious kind of way, though his part is restricted as a kind of troubled child who is now an adult with a story to tell. The detective he is "confessing" to is Powers Boothe, a bit over his head in the part, which demands that detective kind of tenacity and cleverness that gets under the skin of the killer. It doesn't quite click.Women do not appear in the movie, to speak of. There are men and there are boys, in two time periods (the 70s and around 2000, I think). I found it all simplistic and sometimes badly put together.Who's to blame? Ah, back to Bill Paxton, the director, who directed just two movies, and this is his first. It feels like a first try—he's no Orson Welles—and if some see the awkwardness as a kind of campy style, it strikes me more as bordering on stupid. It depends on overdone sound effects that rush on you in a shock, and that have the two sons (as boys) watching the mayhem with a kind of dumbed down confusion.I wish it would build on the psychological layers it presents. I wish the acting was convincing rather than exaggerated in a "style" that wears thin fast. I wish the plot was more than just the killings of a father and the misgivings of two different sons. The falseness throughout reminds me of other movies that have no intention at "invisibility" (in movie-making terms). An odd comparison (in terms of style and production) is "A Christmas Story," which of course has nothing else in common except the rising up of style over content. In this case it's dead serious, and as such, there's little wiggle room.I'm not a bit religious, but I found the dumbing down of some religious conservative view of the world almost insulting, as well. The sad thing is that the movie has the bones of being good. The idea of a son seeing a bad dad has to have resonance with many, and then taking revenge in an appropriate twist is justified, too. It could have been about God and parenting and being young in a confusing world, but it's so filled with reductions and exaggerations I couldn't for a minute buy in. A pushy movie that borders on bad, no matter what its reputation and rating. One small proof—watch Paxton in his final moment. Isn't that a definition of bad acting?
moonspinner55 Two young Midwestern brothers in 1979 are at odds over their widower father's recent actions: he's convinced an angel has selected him to kill seven demons on Earth in the final days before Judgement. The angel has even selected the weapons he is to use, and his boys are to become his accomplices. Actor Bill Paxton also directed this unconvincing and rather pedestrian character study-cum-thriller from a screenplay by Brent Hanley. Paxton is so laconic and low-keyed as a performer (and as a filmmaker) that the father's horrific actions don't make much of an impact. The youngsters face their father's deeds with grim resolve, while Matthew McConaughey (as the older brother now an adult) narrates the proceedings with solemn detachment. *1/2 from ****
willhaskew A genuinely scary horror thriller, told in flashbacks, by a man named Fenton Meiks (Powers Boothe) to FBI Agent Wesley Doyle (Powers Boothe), about how Fenton's brother, Adam, was a serial killer called the "God's Hand" and committed suicide. As they drive to Fenton's hometown so they can corroborate his story, Fenton recounts growing up with Adam and his Dad (Bill Paxton), a widower and single father, who worked as a mechanic. Fenton and Adam's Dad comes homes from work and tells his sons that he's been given a holy vision telling him about demons walking around in human form. He believes he his sons are the front line in the war against hell on Earth. Fenton is skeptical of his Dad and Adam enthusiastically agrees with him. Fenton's Dad is given another vision showing him the tools he'll need to destroy these demons and the names of the people who must be killed. Fenton is horrified when he sees his Dad begin to abduct and murder random strangers. He is unable to reconcile his own disbelief in his Dad's visions and this leads to strife between him and his Dad. Truly a disturbing film that how thin a line there is between spiritual fervor and madness.