Evidence of a Haunting

2010
2.4| 1h21m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 10 November 2010 Released
Producted By: Texas Moving Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Evidence-of-a-Haunting/155689841112671?ref=sgm
Info

While shooting their reality TV show, a team of ghost hunters get into the fight of their lives as they investigate the haunted tunnels deep below an old Texas college.

Genre

Horror

Watch Online

Evidence of a Haunting (2010) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Joey Evans

Production Companies

Texas Moving Pictures

Evidence of a Haunting Videos and Images

Evidence of a Haunting Audience Reviews

Cleveronix A different way of telling a story
Peereddi I was totally surprised at how great this film.You could feel your paranoia rise as the film went on and as you gradually learned the details of the real situation.
FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.
Neive Bellamy Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.
Michael Ledo This film consists of 3 episodes. Rayne Morgan (Jessica D. Fulling) leads a group of supernatural researchers which include a priest (Scott Evans) a Wiccan (Renee Wiggins) and a goth (Korin Medina) equipped with special electronics, cameras, and swagger music.The first episode consists of a young potty mouthed girl who needs a 3 minute exorcism. It was so campy it was funny. Their assistance is needed in a second episode when a poltergeist haunts a home by cleaning things up and stacking items neatly. Seriously? Send that one to my place, please. It uses the dreaded Ouija board as a portal. Yes, it starts out with burning black candles and the next thing you know you're drinking goat's blood with Satan in your living room talking philosophy watching "South Park" reruns.The final episode has a killer spirit named Benjamin who is located in electrical tunnels under a university.The acting was bad. The filming is more professional than the found footage type of films. It uses clear multiple camera angles for which there is no camera, so in essence this is a hybrid movie and not an actual found footage film which don't fool anyone...I hope. Not worth watching unless you want a laugh.Parental Guidance: F-bomb. No sex or nudity. Some cleavage shots.
rosecalifornia It is incredibly bad. So much that it is a joke that it was actually made. I have to ask, if these people in the film had to pay to be in it,because I can't imagine anyone paying for such horrible acting!You go from shakycam to stationary and back again. The camera shots/angles make no sense at all.Excessive botox or just expressionless flat acting. One trying so hard to copy the Jennifer aniston Voice-fry throughout from the women. It is quite painful to watch, you can just picture each of these people reading lines over and over ,while trying to be natural.There are pregnant pauses with each sentence. You can honestly see better acting in Midwest highschool plays. There is one person however that came across his three minute dialogue very nicely....the older guy with the southern accent in that steam tunnel/room. He wasn't even an actor and he was light years better than this group,seriously.I am not kidding you when I say, throughout this movie you truly know what each line will be, before it is read aloud.What's worse than this straight to DVD mess? Or the fact that someone somewhere gave money for its creation. The idea that the writers, directors, actors will be at the local coffee shop, with an attitude that they had something to do with a full length film.
richard.fuller1 I got ten 'movies' from Walmart for $5, and so far, they've been awful. This was one of them and it was truly terrible.Acting is terrible, plot is terrible, writing is terrible. I'm only posting to back up the previous review and state he is absolutely correct in his summation.I originally believed someone submitted this as a potential pilot to Syfy or something, hoping it would get picked up.It seems about like a Syfy 'reality' program. All I could really say is we are given six people, three guys, three girls, who are ghost hunters of sorts.They seem to travel mainly in the south, Louisiana, Texas.I just can't stress enough this is not Blair Witch. It is horribly done. I've seen better performances from new kids on soap operas.And the writing was absolutely atrocious.Thumbs down all the way.
jackstupidjack I wish IMDd would add a 'minus' rating so we can warn people against trash like this nonsense. It feels like the makers thought 'hey let's make a Found Footage' horror using every clichéd line/ horror plot we can find, from the incredibly unoriginal 'abuse dished out by the possessed one minute/not possessed the next minute little girl to the priest, through to the 'exorcism dialogue' from the priest, and that is all in the first few minutes and it all goes downhill from there which is some achievement when, after the first five minutes, you wonder how worse it can get, well it somehow manages to do so. The premise is staggeringly drab showing how utterly clueless the producers/Director and writers must be. A young family have just moved into a new house where they have been experiencing 'disturbing phenomena' and the psychic claims there is 'something very powerful' in the house which is a Native American spirit..., ....blah, blah, blah.....Utterly pointless drivel. I hope all involved with this abomination get lifetime bans from the MPAA from ever being allowed anywhere near a Word Processor, a film set or film equipment again. They should all be tracked down and beaten with heavy sticks by every fan of horror or Found Footage film.The less said about the pointless dreadful techno soundtrack which just doesn't work in the genre, the better.