Matylda Swan It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties.

Anoushka Slater While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

Staci Frederick Blistering performances.

Francene Odetta It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

Freelancer490 Being a big sword and fantasy fan, as well as being a fan of anything to do with King Arthur or Dragons I had to give this a look. It's not great, the budget must have been fairly small, the story is pretty formulaic, and it's pretty clear where things are going, and the characters thinly drawn, though the actors seemed to be doing the best with what they had. The battle scenes are basic, though I thought the final battle was quite lively. There were some nice looking castles showcased and I thought the Dragon CGI was pretty successful, though it's a shame they didn't have the budget to give them more to do. So kind of cheesy, but if you're a fantasy fan, it's okay way to pass 80 minutes if you don't expect too much.

richcotton Shame I cannot give it zero.It was partly funny for the first 10 minutes I put up with it.A cast of few. Terrible, atrocious acting. If you have to watch it insist that you are paid to do so and tied to your chair. That is the only way you will get through it.The plastic bendy swords are worth watching out for tho, that did give me a chuckle.Don't waste your time or money.Polish your shoes or,Wash your hair

sschulteis First of all the "dramatic" acting with pointing fingers and hands, the body language of the actors was horrible. The plot simple and everything foreseeable. Let me put it this: I watched about five minutes of the movie and I thought, it might be a children's movie. Or grown-ups with simple minds. I don't want to waste more than these five minutes on the "movie". The fighting was awful.. some people running with their swords and looking into the air. Every movement or expression on their faces was just exaggeration.. if someone looked angry, it was REALLY angry looking, to show he was angry... I think it was acting from the twenties, when people didn't have much experience with movies and everything had to be theatrical to show what really was meant. I'm glad I didn't pay for this movie, but wasted only a few minutes of my life to this crap.

johnhdavison This would have have to be one of the worst movies i have ever wasted my time watching. The battle scenes ? 12 people on each side. Was the budget for this film $100 or less.Don't waste your time on this,The acting is awful and no name stars. Why do people waste money making such Crap.The cgi looks like someone cut and pasted Castles onto pictures in the background.The editing is also dreadful.Please watch something else, don't waste you time on this film. If the actors got paid for this it was a scam. The sets looked like they where made of Foam rubber. Just awful.