Sexylocher Masterful Movie

Protraph Lack of good storyline.

Aedonerre I gave this film a 9 out of 10, because it was exactly what I expected it to be.

Griff Lees Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

jacobjohntaylor1 This an awesome movie. 4.7 is underrating it. It is very scary. This a great Dracula sequel. This movie as a great story. I line it also has great acting. It also has great special effects. This movie is a must see. It is not as good as Dracula 2000. But still a good movie. It is pretty scary. Stephen Billington is very scary in this movie. Jason Scott Lee is a great actor. This is a great movie. Great movie great movie great movie. Diane Neal is a great actress. She is very pretty. This movie is scarier then a Nightmare on elm street. Patrick Lussier is great film maker. This is a great vampire story. This one of the scariest movie from 2003.

elderado66-1 The movie was OK. The problem I had was that it was to be a sequel to Drac 2000. Problem was...no carry over characters and most importantly totally ignored how the first one ended. The only thing that attached was a brief flash back to the first one and that is it. No continuity. I can overlook a lot but continuity between sequels and prequels drives me bonkers. I can forgive editing errors. I can even forgive when things like a mic drop in a scene but if you are going to do multiples you must must must have concept and script continuity. If you don't you might as well have them as entirely different movies. I can understand why butler wasn't in this $$$$. I would have liked to seen Johnny Lee Miller and Justine Waddell. To some it up what do I know I am just a movie junkie with all the training and no place to use it

Boba_Fett1138 This is one of those movies that is only a sequel by name really. It's a sequel to the 2000 movie "Dracula 2000" but it basically has very little till nothing to do with this movie, that features new and different characters and a different story it follows.Nothing about this movie is too impressive or spectacular and you can perhaps even call this movie a bit of a lackluster but it's simply good enough for what it is. It didn't had a too high budget and got probably shot on a tight schedule but the end result is certainly a watchable and good enough movie.The story is far from convincing or greatly written but at least it's being somewhat original. At least this movie is not being a typical vampire flick with all of the usual clichés and lack of original ideas and creativity of its own.The movie features some of the typical B-movie flick actors. Jason Scott Lee is the vampire killer and Roy Scheider also makes a small appearance. Obviously the acting is not the movie its strongest point. As a matter of fact, the movie doesn't really have any strong points at all but it simply serves its purpose well enough, making this a good watch throughout.6/10http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

auntrebee Let's start with the other opinion about the people in Dracula 2000 leaving Dracula's body hanging. That is just not true. At the end of 2000, Mary has a voice over that says something about her accepting the job of guarding over the remains of Dracula, while the scene is of her and the other guy locking up the coffin in Van Helsing's vault. Now, either Wes Craven forgot that little tidbit of info, or he figured fans like me wouldn't watch the two movies in a row and notice the huge oversight? How could Mary put the wrong remains in her coffin? I don't think there are a lot of flaming,hung from a cross bodies lying around...even in New Orleans during Mardi Gras. I agree that the story left a lot to be desired, but there was enough gore to satisfy any vampire fan. However, there is no way that this blond freak is a better vampire than Gerard Butler. He has more Dracula qualities in his little finger than that guy in his whole body. That scene in 2000 where he kills Christopher Plummer, you see him only in shadows with just one eye gleaming in the moonlight. That was enough to give me the chills. In contrast a pasty white vampire snarling at everyone doing a poor imitation of Reagan from the Exorcist just makes me laugh. Too bad Gerry was probably to busy to reprise his role for the second film, he might have made the movie at least enjoyable.