Matrixston Wow! Such a good movie.

Greenes Please don't spend money on this.

Curapedi I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

Skyler Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

Eric Stevenson I guess you'll have to forgive me for not having seen all of the movies in this series. I still saw most, but I might get some details wrong about how I'm confused about this movie. First of all, it reveals that Isaac has been in a coma or something since the first movie. I believe in the first movie he died and then came back as a zombie or something and the story with him just ended right there. Was there something in Parts 4 and 5 I missed? I would watch him, but I think these movies are stupid and am not going to waste my time with all of them.The fact that I'm doing most of them is good enough. I admit that it was interesting to learn about Isaac returning. He was literally the only character that I knew of that appeared in more than one of these movies. I remember his hammy acting from the first film and how it was entertaining to see that. It made the first film at least not as bad as the sequels. Here, Isaac is pretty boring and really not even that important to the story. This movie features the talk of a prophecy of a girl who needs to make more children of the corn with Isaac's son. I don't know how or when Isaac had a son. Are there even any children in this? Well, there is this one scene with a bunch of kids but they never show up again. The guy who played Isaac actually suffered from a disease that stopped him from growing as he was 25 in the first movie! This movie has no point and is just another entry in this purposeless series. *

Realrockerhalloween The last remaining kids from the first film are now adults, had kids of their own and await the return of their prophet to return like a messiah.Hannah abandoned at birth travels to meet her mother that abandoned her in the town of Gatlin. She meets a boy who takes an instant interest in her as it was foretold they will conceive the promised child.This film was quite good despite the multiple plot holes within the script like adults are permitted inside the cult, they were taken to a new town in the sequel and Isaac didn't die but hung on in a coma.What makes the ending fall flat is it makes you believe a new breed of killer mutants will come forth, but Issac's first born is a case of mistaken omens which leaves you confused rather or not if they succeeded.It does drag a tiny bit unlike the other films as Hannah plays detective for evidence to who her mother is and the people that stalk her. Anyone with an IQ would've picked up the signs immediately or left town on the first bus once the weird activity started.The effects and music weren't to shabby. Any fan of the series will enjoy it no matter the cons and those who glaze over it on TV may turn the channel but it never was meant to be Broadway material.7 /10

gavin6942 Hannah goes back to her hometown (Gatlin) to find out who her mother is, but on the way she picks up a strange man who fore-shadows her life with a passage from the bible.We have some talent here, namely Nancy Allen and Stacy Keach, but overall nothing much to speak of. But, at this point, I suspect the budget was so low they could barely afford craft services.The trivia on IMDb says that John Franklin is the only actor to appear in more than one "Children of the Corn" movie. That is not true. Gary Bullock appeared in parts five and six, although as two different characters. I assume the writer meant "in the same role", but this was not made clear.Now, that being said, for all the terrible things that could probably be written about this film (and many terrible things have), I have to give them credit for bringing back a character from a prior film -- and the original, no less! The franchise has an awful continuity (if the films all make sense in one universe, it is hard to say) so any attempt to fix that is appreciated.

TwitchyDingo After my parents told me to rent the first Children of the Corn, I was skeptical about it and, wow, I got hooked. When I also heard there was 6 more sequels, I grew even more interested. Isaac was killer in the first movie, and I was wondering if they had made a sequel with him in it....bingo, they did. I bought this movie from Blockbuster and I popped it in the DVD player and watched it. OK...my opinion on it?...kind of lame. It's very sad to see a movie with such a promising title to it, and have it fall into pieces. Seriously guys, is this "Hannah's Return"? or "Isaac's Return"?. All I saw in it was Hannah Hannah Hannah, I mean....where's Isaac in all of this? a few shots here and there?. The acting was mediocre in some retrospects; John did a great job with Isaac's role in my opinion. Gabriel reminded me of a pretty boy, trying to get his hands on some girl. Ugh, but..being a fan of COTC, I did enjoy the fact they shamelessly tried to even make another sequel and it's still sitting on my shelf. One other thing I didn't like was the fact Isaac was in a coma for 19 years...then barely has time to acknowledge himself, and just dies at the end. This could've turned out to be a great movie....if it weren't for the fact these people didn't even try hard enough.5/10 stars.