Buffy the Vampire Slayer

1992 "She knows a sucker when she sees one."
5.7| 1h26m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 24 July 1992 Released
Producted By: 20th Century Fox
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Blonde, bouncy Buffy is your typical high school cheerleader. But all that changes when a strange man informs her she's been chosen by fate to kill vampires.

Genre

Horror, Action, Comedy

Watch Online

Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1992) is now streaming with subscription on Paramount+

Director

Fran Rubel Kuzui

Production Companies

20th Century Fox

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Audience Reviews

ThiefHott Too much of everything
BroadcastChic Excellent, a Must See
Freaktana A Major Disappointment
Aneesa Wardle The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.
bowmanblue Ah, 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' – the seminal TV show of the nineties which launched Kirsty Swanson as a household name. Well, maybe in a parallel universe. Before Sarah Michelle Gellar started saving the world (a lot) and falling in love with almost every good-looking undead stud in Sunnydale, they actually tried the format on the big screen. This version never really took off and has kind of been lost among the annals of cinematic history, only being revived as a strange beast of interest that (TV) Buffy fans like to watch, simply in order to compare this weird 'alternate take' on their icons to what the 'real' thing turned out like. And I have to confess that that's why I watched it. I was never a mega-fan of the nineties TV series, but I've grown to watch it through my daughter and was kind of curious what the filmic incarnation of Buffy was like. If it was up to my daughter she'd probably end the review here as she could barely sit through the whole film! However, I thought it was an interesting little 'compendium piece' if nothing else.Yes, it doesn't have quite such a memorable cast list as the TV show and the dialogue isn't half as snappy (and the vamps don't 'dust' when killed, probably due to budget reasons!), yet it still maintains a strange sort of charm. Whereas in the TV show it is definitely Sarah Michelle Geller's show, here it's the older, more established actors who are a more memorable, for our non-Geller Buffy mast face off against B-movie veteran of the eighties Rutger Hauer, while being taught her slaying skills by 'watcher' Donald Sutherland.I guess the filmic incarnation of Buffy is even harder to 'sell' now in retrospect than it was at the time. When it first came out it didn't have huge names, big effects or anyone that would draw in the masses. And, let's face it… the title of 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' does sound a little cheesy. I know the film (and TV show) doesn't always take itself too seriously and a healthy dose of cheese is required during watching at all times. I just could imagine the audience's reaction to seeing a film entitled this. It seems to be too old for youngsters and yet to 'teen-ish' for adults, therefore didn't really draw in a wide and varied audience.As with the TV show, we meet our titular 'slayer' Buffy, who's a teenager who just so happens to be this generation's 'chosen one,' tasked with wiping vampires out from the face of the Earth (or rather just her hometown to start with!). Once you've invested your time in the TV show, it's hard to watch the film without trying to relate it back to the ongoing series. I see this as a kind of 'prequel' as it deals with Buffy learning of her heritage and being taught the ways of the Force (or slaying vamps – whatever). And, for that, it does almost work when looked at in conjunction with the TV show. Yes, there are always going to be some continuity errors that don't really match up, but, seeing as the two mediums don't occupy the same 'shared universe,' this can only be expected.It's hard to recommend the film really, as fans of the genre will undoubtedly be so into the TV show that they refuse to except this as part of the lore. However, if you're someone who can appreciate the 'evolution' of the character and wants to take a sneak peek into an alternate universe where Sarah Michelle Gellar doesn't reign supreme, give this one a go. Yes, it's daft and yes, it's cheesy, but wasn't the TV show all that, too? This isn't a film for everyone, but it is one that does still have an audience out there, even if it's getting smaller by the day as more and more people only ever remember the TV show as the 'real' Buffy. But this one could be a lot worse (especially seeing as we've never got a new series from Joss Whedon!).
jlcdwmartin The uncut DVD version, which is what I have, is overloaded with what I would call "boys' locker room" vulgarity. You can tell immediately that this was aimed primarily at the young males in the audience by the appearance of "jokes" about the male anatomy. Female cycles are not funny in any context; yet rude inferences to this were allowed to remain in the finished product.I personally cannot imagine young people, especially girls, behaving in such a bawdy, slatternly manner. My impression is also that Buffy and her coterie have abundant permission from their well-heeled parents, so that they can go shopping at the drop of a Macy's credit card.Yes, the original premise of a "cheerleader who fights vampires" has been shown in the follow-up TV series to be entertaining and appreciable. Sadly, this movie "trial run" is a dud (as the original and highly disappointed writer pretty much described it himself). The impression one has is that this was a movie made as an interim filler between more "real"acting jobs for the cast.
fireandlightning Skip this movie and go watch the series! I knew going in that it would be a bad one, I mean look at the reviews.. 5.5 stars out of TEN? That's a bad movie. I love the Buffy series and thought why not watch the movie to see the whole story. There's good actors in this movie, like Donald Sutherland, Luke Perry, Hilary Swank and David Arquette, but even they didn't do a particularly good job. Joss Whedon is a genius when it comes to many series/films, Buffy, Angel, Firefly, Dollhouse, Agents of Shield - but this movie was among the worst I've seen. Good idea, but bad lines and bad acting makes a bad movie. I can't really say so many positive things about it, more than without it there might've not have been a TV-show.
SnoopyStyle Buffy (Kristy Swanson) is the quintessential valley girl cheerleader. She and her friends are all clueless. She is approached by Merrick (Donald Sutherland) and told that she is the Slayer. There are vampires in the world, and there is a slayer who fights them. When one slayer falls, another one takes her place. It is Buffy's turn to be the Slayer. She is joined by a slacker outcast Pike (Luke Perry) in a fight against the powerful Lothos (Rutger Hauer).This is most notable for who wrote the script, Joss Whedon. Although he definitely has disowned this with all the changes to his script. It has a funny co-starring role from Paul Reubens. The style is lacking. Kristy Swanson has the looks but not quite the attitude of the valley girl exactly. She always seems a bit too bright and too serious for the clueless role. It is definitely a very light sarcastic take on the vampire movie.