Stevecorp Don't listen to the negative reviews

Tayloriona Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

Jemima It's a movie as timely as it is provocative and amazingly, for much of its running time, it is weirdly funny.

Cheryl A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

Edgar Allan Pooh . . . of the genuine article that MGM producers Harman and Ising were starting to churn out in their earlier Warner Bros. days. BOTTLES never misses an opportunity to pull a punch, especially with its "This was all a dream" hackneyed closing. These bloated BOTTLES drag on for at least 25% longer than a comparable Warner Bros. Looney Tune, while encompassing well under half the action. None of the many "Things in a store come to life after hours"-themed Looney Tunes feel the need to include the trite and unnecessary framing device found here. The sight gags and puns in a Looney Tune of this nature are twice as clever, and come three times as fast. The "Ammonia Spirits" chase scene in BOTTLES is totally Lame & Tame compared to those packed into the final half of even a sub-par Looney Tune. The latter's cutting-edge ethnic humor with Pancake Mixes, Tamales, and the Gold Dust Twins also is MIA in these pathetic BOTTLES. In summary, BOTTLES are for babies!!

tedg It seems that one major theology of animation concerns the animating (meaning coming to life) of normally inanimate objects. Its one strain worth tracing, because with today's film technologies, animals can easily be seen to talk and even wear clothes and such. Its the power to make objects and environments have agency that gives great animation its power. And if you trace the evolution of the idea, you'll come through this. Its an unimaginative idea: a chemist/druggist mixes a poison, then dreams that it comes alive and evilly threatens him, together with all the other objects in the lab.As with all early attempts with object life, some of the objects must be juvenile, and the centerpiece here are three baby bottle who whine because their diapers are dirty.This was made toward the end of prohibition when use of opiates and marijuana became its great rise in popularity in the US, and that's the not so subtle subtext here.Unfortunately the animation itself isn't any great advance.Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.

nnwahler "We don't feel like safe and tidy/No one here will change our di-di/That's the reason why/All we do is cry...." These 1930's MGM Harman-Ising cartoons, with their lush Technicolor hues, are still waiting to be discovered by cartoon fans. Many have but the thinnest of story lines to hang onto, but the musical numbers in this one--to say nothing of the innumerable puns (the "baby bottles," the sleeping powder," the "smelling salts," etc.) take the prize for sheer invention. (Or, perhaps, sheer audacity.) Genuine suspense, too, in the climax. So when's Time/Warner going to put out the "Happy Harmonies" shorts into a complete DVD collection??

boblipton 1936 was the year Harman and Ising began to create good cartoons, but they remained wedded to a sentimental childishness that stopped them from achieving great cartoons. Ising would eventually overcome that, but Harman never quite did. Here, the problem is that we know the main character is sleeping, so his dreaming peril is not as frightening as it might be.The best thing about their cartoons from this period is their lush use of Technicolor. While this is not so over the top as TO SPRING, it shows some excellent visual glosses.The middle of this cartoon is a common one for Harman-Ising and for Schlesinger in this period: the contents of a bookstore, row of billboards or, in this case, the various brands in a drugstore. Some of them are still current. Enjoy spotting the ones you know.