Blood Slaves of the Vampire Wolf

1996
3.1| 1h45m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 01 January 1996 Released
Producted By: Psycho Cinema Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A young vampire, named Selena, resides in Los Angeles and has her mute lackey Monk hunt down women to kill and drink their blood. Selena brings into her small group Antonio, a hulking wolf-man to assist and further terrorize the people of L.A. In the meantime, a dogged police inspector and a resourceful young woman try to piece together the strange murders and disappearances before more victims turn up.

Genre

Fantasy, Horror

Watch Online

Blood Slaves of the Vampire Wolf (1996) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Conrad Brooks

Production Companies

Psycho Cinema Pictures

Blood Slaves of the Vampire Wolf Videos and Images

Blood Slaves of the Vampire Wolf Audience Reviews

Cathardincu Surprisingly incoherent and boring
Nonureva Really Surprised!
ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.
Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
iksnyzcar Let me first start off by saying that I got this movie in a collection of 4 movies called Blood Hunt. It may not be the worst movie on it but its close.There is a dedication to Ed Wood and that there alone should have told me to stop watching. Next come a long intro of a rubber bat on strings flying around(unfortunately this is the best special effects in this movie). Followed by an hour and forty minutes of garbage.I can't really say one good thing about Blood Slaves of the Vampire Wolf. First it was shot on video with no extra audio recording devices. So in some scenes you can't hear anything and others are way too loude. I had to keep changing the volume on my t.v. Next there was no acting at all but I guess that went well with the plot that wasn't there. Nothing in this film made any sense from people falling in love for no reason, to every vampire having differn't rules. Everything in this film is very cheap, avoid at all cost.
pjwoodall1 i've met Conrad brooks at the local antique and collectibles shows and made the mistake of buying this and getting it autographed. i finally decided it wasn't worth the effort. i don't know if brooks remembers me, but he's stopped telling me he was in the worst movie of all time. i've seen worse than PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE(NEKROMATIK 2 anyone?). he still tries to get me to buy his other movies. i once asked him what he thought of ED WOOD, and he said it was a bunch of lies. i didn't ask him why he appeared in it then. still brooks can be entertaining. Edd Byrne's seemed to resent that my wife's wheelchair prevented his fans from getting autograph. i still remember getting a rise of out Lana wood when i asked her about john Wayne killing her sister in THE SEARCHERS. "john Wayne didn't kill my sister," she snapped. i found that theory in CELLULOID INDIANS, a book on how Hollywood has treated native Americans on film.
Vandal-3 The only reason I got this movie was because I am a fan of low budget B Movies. I am a fan of Ed Wood. Wood supporting player Conrad Brooks directs and stars in it. I bought it from Brooks at a memorabilia show a couple years back. It is horrible! I can't believe that it was even listed in the database. It was shot on video. The editing was done on a system that didn't even have a flying erase head. The only mike that was used is the one on the video camera. You can't even hear the dialogue. It is amateurish to the point of thinking that a ten year old made it. Then again, I bet a ten year old could have done a better job.