Infamousta
brilliant actors, brilliant editing
Curapedi
I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.
ChanFamous
I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.
filippaberry84
I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.
melika-beauty
The film was terribly tedious and long In the third millennium, making such films is a waste of time and a waste of the material resources of a community I think directors and screenwriters of such films should be sanctioned This means that no one will go to the movies for many years The people of the world maybe unemployed, but they are not at the hands of people It was worth nothing to watch free of charge Because my valuable time and my likes took What really worthless things are done for money
michael-stenlund
This movie made it from a solid 7/10 on my personal rating scale up to an 8, just barely, because the ending was absolutely fantastic.I highly recommend watching this with family and loved ones. It is a warmer movie than movie #1 The Da Vinci Code, and there is more love. It felt more balanced than the first film did to me.Enjoy. You can thank me afterwards.
carolpink
great movie one of my favorite actors victor alfieri is on angels and demons,, sadly the IMDb took the message boards off and now i have to write a review,, not fair, IMDb should put the message boards back on,, and i have no idea what IMDb meant with if you write a spoiler without warning reads your name will be added to the blacklist,, sorry but im angry and have no respect for what IMDb done to our messages boards,, bring the message boards back,,
generationofswine
It is actually better than "The Da Vinci Code." In the first movie...which actually takes place AFTER this one, the book is one cliffhanger of a chapter after the other. The chapters were short, the story formulaic, making for a book that everyone was bound to devour...It's just books like that don't seem to transfer right when you turn them into one movie. Had they made it into a miniseries, kept the chapter format, it would have been better."Angels & Demons" was a different beast. It wasn't as beautifully streamlined in its source material and as a result it translated a lot better into movie form.Not that the movie is great, it certainly has its flaws. It's just a better adaptation.Ewan Mcgregor does fine, Hanks, however, well, he didn't have much to work with. I mean, honestly he is playing the mother of all Mary Sue characters and that is just hard to act.Almost faultless and as a result, Hanks is stuck playing a fantasy character that is just too good at everything, someone who's only fault is that he is right all the time.It makes for a boring hero, which makes for a boring movie.