Livestonth I am only giving this movie a 1 for the great cast, though I can't imagine what any of them were thinking. This movie was horrible

Brenda The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Gary The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

Lela The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews Let's face it; this movie is bad. Not decent, not with one or two things going for it... just bad. I see no reason to beat around the bush(a rather silly thing to do anyway... what is there to beat around a bush? What reason, for what purpose? Anyway...), so let's just agree that this movie doesn't actually have anything going for it. The plot is thin and hardly developed at all. The acting is hammy. The characters are paper-thin. The dialog and writing in general is rather sophomoric. The mood is lazily set, and the atmosphere is too limited and is too weakly built. The suspense is practically non-existent. The monster is pitiful. The action is unimpressive. However, I would like to bring something to the attention of anyone who has seen this film(and maybe more importantly, those who haven't); this film has some pretty interesting cinematography and editing. It's experimental, it takes chances and it creates a unique feel. It pulls you in in a completely different way than a typical mainstream film. This, and this alone, brings this film up to a 2 rating. It makes it just exactly worth watching for film lovers such as myself. But only just barely. I recommend this only to huge fans of movies, and only as a means of study to explore the editing and cinematography. For all other purposes, it's useless. It's been done and it's been done better, many times. 2/10

sekulic2002 I would like to point out that Adrenalin is a very good movie, although short, but it gives a lot in a very short while; something that "bigger movies" couldn't. Slowly dragged plot gets hooked up and Lambert explodes on the screen only to show all those who leaved his name from the big picture in action movies. Lambert and Henstridge look great like partners on screen, there's an interesting sub story with Natasha's daughter. Albert Pyun is a master of B-movies. He guides the overwhelming turbulent thriller on a not predictable way. Weapons and other equipment in movie look a little out of form but this is just a small failure.

sarastro7 This really *is* the worst movie I've ever seen. And there's not much more to say. Horrible, worthless junk.All they do is run around in some old condemned building for 90 minutes, completely failing to build suspense or intensity of any kind. It's the most pathetic and laughable movie I've ever had the displeasure of watching. It was shockingly underwhelming; I could hardly believe my eyes. Pure exploitation of name actors like Lambert and Henstridge with absolutely zero storytelling or action substance. A remarkable example of the kind of depths the video rental market will stoop to in order to cheat you of your bucks. It's a total rip-off, not of any other movie but of your time and money.Avoid as if your life depended on it.1 out of 10.

bmj001 This is a horrible movie. As if the plot wasn't bad enough, the acting is even worse, the screen shots are etchy at times and the script, my god, the script just plainly doesn't make any sense. The only question I have about this movie is, did MST3K get their hands on this movie yet?