Merolliv
I really wanted to like this movie. I feel terribly cynical trashing it, and that's why I'm giving it a middling 5. Actually, I'm giving it a 5 because there were some superb performances.
Brendon Jones
It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.
bob_meg
Aardvarks are strange little creatures. Not especially attractive, they distinguish themselves among prey animals as being especially nasty when deliberately provoked. They look benign enough, almost laughable with their short squat legs and long pig-like snout. But they can kill a predator often by virtue of sheer tenacity. One of their tricks is to roll onto their backs, seemingly defeated, only to rip their attackers to shreds with a cluster of claws that closely resemble box cutters. They won't start a fight but they can finish one.I can only think this was the titular inspiration for Kitao Sakurai's enigmatically lachrymose "thriller" (a stretch for sure). Larry Lewis, who is blind from birth, is the star of this off-the-radar indie from 2010 and is something like the burrowing nocturnal mammal of the film's title. He's largely an object of curiosity or vague mockery, yet he's extremely independent and, one senses (especially in the first scene of him stalking unrelentingly through a very dense forest) tough. He's also something of a lone wolf.Until he meets Darren (Darren Branch), a Jujitsu instructor, that is. Branch quickly engages us with an absorbing monologue on the philosophy of this fascinating self-defense art early in the film. It's a four or five minute speech, but it flies by --- it's that well written and delivered. Branch is also skilled in subtly relaying many of his character's self-destructive, darker urges, often times non-verbally. Darren becomes embroiled in some shady activity that is never fully elucidated (another failing on the part of Sakurai). When Darren turns up dead in his apartment, Larry's claws come out, in surprisingly violent outbursts.Although the reason why Larry and Darren click so well isn't overtly apparent, the attraction seems believable from Darren's side of the fence. Larry Lewis, by contrast, is not so adroit in this regard and that's to the movie's detriment. He's not a professional actor and it's painfully obvious. I guess since Larry and Darren are playing versions of "themselves" Sakurai assumed dramatic training wasn't important. Well...sorry, when you're attempting something this complex, it does. This isn't a documentary.Neither actors get much in the way of help from Sakurai's script or direction. He seems to be relying exclusively on the actors to do all the work. That can succeed in some cases, but Aardvark's story is simply too oblique to benefit from this kind of laissez-faire direction.As a result, you get a film that can accurately be summarized (as another reviewer did) as "tedious". It is not a well-paced film, and Sakurai's free-form narrative doesn't fill in the blanks, in any regard, as to motivations, subtextual emotional current, etc.That said, it is a very well-photographed (often downright beautiful) feature film, and if you are in the mood for a piece of filmmaking that has that tranquil, hypnotic quality (such as that produced regularly by Gus Van Sant), you might like Aardvark. Unfortunately, Sakurai has neither the story-telling chops or ability to draw out amazing performances from his players, as does Van Sant. He's in over his head with this one.Aardvark is daring in its own quiet way, but it's overreach eventually strands you at it's joltingly-abrupt denouement, unfulfilled and frustrated at its lofty yet admirable ambitions.
leatherdykeuk
I really wanted to like this film. It took me months to track down but I finally got it from Amazon (It was 'out of stock' for months). I wish I hadn't. As a practitioner of BJJ I was hoping for some inspirational rolling but the BJJ was only a small part of the film. Neither documentary nor fiction, it teeters across the line of both and achieves the benefits of neither. There are long periods of nothing at all (watching Candy walk along the street, for example). Larry himself is outstanding, the other characters less so, and when Danny talks about the philosophy of Jiu-jitsu, it jars with his drug-taking, alcoholic binges. The police detective was obnoxious. A real shame.Continuity error - Larry and Darren are rolling with Larry wearing his blue belt long before he was awarded it.
