Linbeymusol
Wonderful character development!
SpuffyWeb
Sadly Over-hyped
Sameer Callahan
It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.
Tyreece Hulme
One of the best movies of the year! Incredible from the beginning to the end.
Finfrosk86
Oh my god, I hate this damn genre. It is so mind-numbingly boring.The only redeeming quality in this movie is the cheesiness. No wait, the audience's reaction to the cheesiness. There was a lot of laughing at a lot of the stupid dialogue and cinematography. And for a change the audience laughing at stuff not meant to be funny, didn't p*** me off. (I usually hate when people laugh because they think something is stupid)There is one actor that has a real good presence, and the scenes with him in them are not boring. Only because of him. Pretty much everything else here is boring. Annoyingly boring. I don't remember much from this, as I saw it some years ago, but I do remember being bored.I guess I don't have to sum it up for ya, but if I were to, I would use one word. It starts with the blessed letter b.
christopher-underwood
Delirious movie and one of Fulci's best. Set in London, there are some decent street scenes but these are mainly the usual 'tourist' ones but there is spectacular use made of Alexandra Palace towards the end. The opening is simply wonderful. Having purchased the recent Optimum release, I was comparing various versions I have by screening the opening sequence from the train/orgy dream sequence and through the lesbian seduction scene on the red bed and didn't even begin to tire of watching it. There is also a most graphic and affective breast slashing scene I did not recall and the Morricone music holding everything together beautifully. There are stretches, especially towards the end , when it is a bit 'police procedural' but there is certainly enough surreal/psychedelic visuals to prevent this becoming the least bit pedestrian.
HumanoidOfFlesh
A troubled rich woman Carol Hammond played by Florinda Bolkan is suffering from a series of bizarre sexual dreams where she indulges in lesbian activities with her neighbor Julia Durer(Anita Strindberg).Unfortunately one morning after another perverse sex dream culminating in a gory knifing of Julia,Carol is shocked to find that Julia was murdered in her apartment the stormy night before.When all evidence points to Carol being the culprit she must not only investigate the crime but determine what is dream and what is reality."Lizard in a Woman's Skin" is perhaps the most bizarre and puzzling Fulci's giallo.The cinematography by Luigi Kuvellier is splendid with some gorgeous visuals and the dream scenes are appropriately psychedelic.The eviscerated dogs sequence still shocks unprepared viewers drawn into the murder mystery aspect of the film.8 out of 10.
Jonny_Numb
(Second review: pertains to the recent DVD release that clocks in at 103 minutes--allegedly the most complete version available.)To those--such as myself--who were weaned on Lucio Fulci's post-"Zombie" gorefests, looking back at his earlier work can be a jarring experience. Films like "Don't Torture a Duckling" and "The Psychic" show a filmmaker bringing a sense of macabre mystery to the mainstream; the same can be said for "Lizard in a Woman's Skin," his first foray into the 'giallo' subgenre...though the result is terribly disappointing.It's hard to ignore the cue Fulci takes from Dario Argento, making an animal-themed (and relatively restrained) film in the footsteps of "The Bird With the Crystal Plumage." There are glimpses of the frenetic (almost invasive) camera tricks and stylistic techniques Fulci would mine with more confidence (and effect) in his gritty horror outings. While he stages an impressive extended chase through Alexandra Palace (beginning in the underground tunnels and finishing on the rooftop), piques our interest with a smattering of sex, violence, and psychedelics at the very beginning, and gives us a dog-vivisection dream sequence that foreshadows his later work (and is still gruesomely effective today), what lies in between is talky and largely uninteresting.The plot is simple enough: Carol Hammond (Florinda Bolkan--"Don't Torture a Duckling"), daughter of a prominent politician in Great Britain, is afflicted with strange hallucinations that literally bleed over into reality when her next-door neighbor, Julia Durer (sexy Anita Strindberg) is stabbed to death. Meanwhile, Carol's husband Frank (Jean Sorel) is carrying on an affair with a family friend, and Carol's daughter-in-law, Joan (Edy Gall) is somehow involved with a bunch of hippie types who know something about the murder.I consider Fulci's "Don't Torture a Duckling" one of the finer examples of a giallo done right--it wasn't so heavily stylized that it detracted from character or story, and at times invoked a sense of realism-through-restraint. "Lizard" is almost the total opposite--the characters tend to become dancing puppets within a plot that's constantly twisting itself into a pretzel; indeed, much like Argento's style-drenched films, the best method of viewing is to just drink in the look and feel of things, and wait for the inevitable Closing Revelation, in which all the convoluted plot points are explained. Yet "Lizard"--save for its experimental, color-soaked LSD scenes--isn't even that much fun to watch; taking place in a perpetually gloomy Britain, one feels Fulci stretching for legitimacy and falling short. The dialog scenes are endless to the point of tedium, and produce more confusion than intrigue.In short, "Lizard" is required viewing for the Fulci completist, but otherwise not worth the bother.