Limerculer A waste of 90 minutes of my life

Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Kodie Bird True to its essence, the characters remain on the same line and manage to entertain the viewer, each highlighting their own distinctive qualities or touches.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

fulbert I don't think the film is the total failure. It's just a bit... confused. It really could've been better, and that's a pity, because some episodes really are moving, especially to a person who had to suffer all that - I mean, the collapse of the Union, the betrayal of "fellow" republics and... oh, what the hell! What I mean is the film has some really good ideas, some of which are very nicely shown (e.g. attestation in the Ukrainian port - yeah, that episode was sweet!) but in general - oh my. I had an impression that the director was a green novice who just bit more than he could swallow. If it was directed by a person who really did know what he was doing, everything could've been quite different. BTW, the script is based on the collection of short stories about Soviet Navy titled "72 Metra", by Russian naval writer and former Navy officer Aleksandr Pokrovskii. The stories are simply magnificent: some of them are as funny as hell, and the other ones are very deeply touching. The guy's a writing genius, so I deeply recommend you find and read the book. Well, I don't know whether it's translated into English but if it isn't, learn Russian, then find and read it. It's way better than the film.P.S. And yes, to those who consider parts of the film nationalistic. I deeply understand that furious tolerance and merciless political correctness are conquering the world, and in fact, I don't really care. The film is not about furious tolerance and political correctness - it's about life of military people who don't in fact care that much about all this stuff. It was explained about the crew's dislike of Ukrainians in the film, wasn't it? And as for that phrase "Hey, Slavs, anyone alive there?" - it's just not appropriately translated. "Hey, Slavs" is just a piece of lyrics of an old song and has no nationalistic connotation whatsoever. I think it just shows that people are trying to stand firm in a very bad situation, that is all. P.P.S. Yeah, and the sub was called "Slavyanka", if you didn't notice, which stands for "Slavic girl". So the Slavs in the film could've been just "Slavyanka" crew members.

Rustem Yahin The only modern Russian film I can label a total failure (given it was directed by Khotinenko, formerly the leader of 1980s Russian intellectual cinema). Nothing and nobody worked well in this piece of crap. How can one shoot a film which is a total disaster given the best opportunities provided: Ennio Morricone as a music composer, Chulpan Khamatova (the best Russian cinema actress (along with Ingeborga Dapkunaite)) as a leading female hero, enormous funds of Russia's Channel One, good (meaning cheap:) connections with the military allowing to use resources of the Russian Navy, and a plenty of good examples of "submarine movies"?It is almost impossible to make a bad submarine movie nowadays given the stunning (e.g. Das Boot by Wolfgang Petersen) or simply good like "K-19" or "U-571" sub film examples. "72m" even employs some citations from Das Boot which means that somebody from the film crew has seen that film:)) - however, ineffectively.One might argue this was the first experience of a "blockbuster" film by contemporary Russian TV producers - I regret they have not realized that they should better shoot their TV-series crap than to spoil the perception of the great Russian cinema. I mean the great Russian directors like Eisenstein, Kozintsev, Pudovkin, Dovzhenko, Klimov, Tarkovsky, etc. just whirl in their coffins when somebody tries to judge about the Russian cinema thinking of the "72 meters".The same producers later delivered the "Night Watch" - an evenly questionable, though better shot, piece of film. So there is some hope for Russian viewers - maybe the Channel One (ORT) producers in a dozen of films will learn what they had to learn at a film school which nobody of them have attended. Please do not waste your time or money. 0/10.

nikolb I love this film because it doesn't try to make the regular drama -"everybody died" or"everybody happy" it shows something else. The bottom line of this film wasn't to save the crew from the submarine but to put the soul to the next level and if there is one person that you can save you have to save him.Maybe most of the people who saw the film ,saving this strange person- Makovetskiy(Chernenko) wasn't necessary for them but it was.Like Makovetskiy's character says in the film :"The world payed so little attention to me that I thought myself dead"and maybe because of this he was worth saving.By saving Chernenko they save their souls. Very good actors the best music by Ennio Morricone

ivalti I have seen an advertisment on TV and went to see this film in cinema. And i was shocked - this is really good film with good playing of all actors. This film is provided by Mariccone's music that help the film to be more pretty. I can't say it is action nor comedy. No, it is well-made drama with an atmosphere of the best films, No, it has its own atmosphere - sad, but sometimes funny. The film to think, and to hope, the film to cry and believe in a better life. This is good film about strong mans. I was depressed for some time but when I saw the film the depression left me. I think forever. I hope, 72 metres would be well-comented and become one of the best films in imdb. Big thanks to creators of this film and good kuck to restorated cinema of Russia!I advice this film to everybody 10/10.